DiNardo v. WOW 1 DAY Painting LLC
Filing
46
ORDER dismissing Wow 1 Day Painting, LLC's counterclaims without prejudice. Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
8
9
10
VAL DINARDO,
CASE NO. C16-1600JLR
Plaintiff,
11
v.
12
13
WOW 1 DAY PAINTING, LLC,
Defendant.
14
15
ORDER DISMISSING
COUNTERCLAIMS WITHOUT
PREJUDICE
On January 23, 2018, the court issued an order granting Defendant WOW 1 Day
16
Painting, LLC’s (“WOW”) motion for summary judgment and directing the parties to
17
show cause why WOW’s compulsory counterclaims should not be dismissed without
18
prejudice. (Order (Dkt. # 42).) On January 31, 2018, the parties responded to the court’s
19
order to show cause. (WOW Resp. (Dkt. # 45); DiNardo Resp. (Dkt. # 43).) Both WOW
20
and Plaintiff Val DiNardo agree that WOW’s counterclaims should be dismissed without
21
prejudice. (See WOW Resp. at 2 (“WOW respectfully submits that considerations of
22
judicial economy, convenience, and fairness to the litigants are served by dismissing the
ORDER - 1
1
counterclaims without prejudice . . . .”); DiNardo Resp. at 5 (“[T]his Court should
2
dismiss the remaining Counterclaims without prejudice.”).) Accordingly, the court
3
DISMISSES WOW’s counterclaims WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 1 The court further
4
DIRECTS the Clerk to close this file.
5
Dated this 2nd day of February, 2018.
6
7
A
8
JAMES L. ROBART
United States District Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
1
22
The court makes no determination as to the appropriate forum for refiling WOW’s
counterclaims.
ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?