Canty v. King County et al

Filing 190

ORDER ADOPTING 157 Report and Recommendation. Defendants' motions to dismiss this action as a discovery sanction (Dkts. 121 , 123 ) are GRANTED. Plaintiff's second amended complaint (Dkt. 38 ) and this action are DISMISSED, with prejudice, for failure of plaintiff to comply with the rules of discovery as set forth in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Judge Richard A. Jones. (TH) (cc: Plaintiff via first class mail)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 9 KYLE LYDELL CANTY, Plaintiff, 10 11 12 Case No. C16-1655-RAJ v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS CITY OF SEATTLE, et al., Defendants. 13 14 15 The Court, having reviewed plaintiff’s second amended complaint, defendants’ motions 16 to dismiss this action as a discovery sanction, the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable 17 James P. Donohue, United States Magistrate Judge, any objections thereto, and the remaining 18 record, hereby finds and ORDERS: 19 (1) The Report and Recommendation is approved and adopted. 20 (2) Defendants’ motions to dismiss this action as a discovery sanction (Dkts. 121, 21 123) are GRANTED. 22 23 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS - 1 1 (3) Plaintiff’s second amended complaint (Dkt. 38) and this action are DISMISSED, 2 with prejudice, for failure of plaintiff to comply with the rules of discovery as set forth in the 3 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 4 (4) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to plaintiff, to counsel for 5 defendants, and to the Honorable James P. Donohue. 6 DATED this 3rd day of August, 2018. 7 A 8 9 The Honorable Richard A. Jones United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?