Benitez v. Key

Filing 23

ORDER granting petitioner's 22 Second Motion for Extension of Time; RENOTING 19 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Objections to R&R due by 11/30/2017, Noting Date 12/1/2017, signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.**2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Carlos Benitez, Prisoner ID: 715131)(SWT)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 9 CARLOS BENITEZ, JR., 10 11 12 13 Petitioner, NO. C16-1686RSL vs. JAMES KEY, Respondent. SECOND ORDER RENOTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 This matter comes before the Court on petitioner’s second “Motion for Extension of Time to File Objections to Report and Recommendation.” Dkt. # 22. On August 10, 2017, Magistrate Judge James P. Donohue issued his Report and Recommendation. Dkt. # 19. On September 6, 2017, this Court granted an extension of time for the petitioner to file his objections to the Report and Recommendation on or before October 5, 2017. Dkt. # 21. On September 19, 2017, the petitioner filed his second request for continuance. The Court will GRANT a second and final continuance absent extenuating circumstances. Objections to the Report and Recommendation, if any, shall be filed and served on or before Thursday, November 30, 2017. Failure to file objections within the specified time may affect the right to appeal. Objections should be noted for consideration on the third Friday after they are filed. Responses to the objections may be filed on or before the note date. If no timely objections are filed, the matter will be ready for consideration on December 1, 2017. 27 28 SECOND ORDER RENOTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 1 DATED this 8th day of November, 2017. 2 3 4 5 6 A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECOND ORDER RENOTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?