Sia et al v. Airasia Berhad et al

Filing 63

ORDER granting 62 Stipulated Motion for order relating to the motion to dismiss of dft Danaher Corporation; granting dft Danaher Corp's 47 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; pltfs granted leave to amend their complaint as to dft Danaher Corp within 30 days by Judge Ricardo S Martinez.(RS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 9 10 11 12 AT SEATTLE HENRY TANAYA SIA, and THERESIA TANAYA SONG, individually, as co-personal representatives of the estate of SOETIKNO SIA (TAN), and as co-personal representatives of the estate of CHRISTIEN YUANITA JOU, deceased, 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Case No.: 2:16-cv-01692 RSM ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION RELATING TO MOTION TO DISMISS FILED BY DEFENDANT DANAHER CORPORATION Plaintiffs, v. AIRASIA BERHAD, a corporation, HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., a corporation, GOODRICH CORPORATION, a corporation, DANAHER CORPORATION, a corporation, and ARTUS, S.A.S., a corporation, Defendants. THIS MATTER, having come before the undersigned Judge on the Stipulated Motion for 21 Order relating to the Motion to Dismiss of Defendant Danaher Corporation, and the Court 22 23 finding good cause therefor, 24 NOW, THEREFORE, 25 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Motion to Dismiss 26 (Doc. 47) filed by Defendant Danaher Corporation is granted without prejudice and Plaintiffs are ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION RELATING TO MOTION TO DISMISS OF DANAHER CORPORATION- 1 1 granted leave to amend their complaint as to Defendant Danaher Corporation within thirty (30) 2 days of this Order. 3 4 DATED this 20 day of March 2017. 5 6 7 8 A RICARDO S. MARTINEZ CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION RELATING TO MOTION TO DISMISS OF DANAHER CORPORATION- 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?