Davis et al v. Hayes et al
Filing
22
MINUTE ORDER REFERRING MOTION: 20 MOTION to Amend filed by Keith Adair Davis referred to Judge Tsuchida. Authorized by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (swt) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
KEITH ADAIR DAVIS,
Plaintiff,
Case No. C16-1709RSM-BAT
MINUTE ORDER RE: MOTION TO
AMEND COMPLAINT
v.
WILLIAM HAYES, et al.,
14
15
16
17
Defendants.
This MINUTE ORDER is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable Ricardo S.
Martinez, Chief United States District Judge:
18
Plaintiff Keith Adair Davis filed an Amended Complaint on February 23, 2017.
19
Dkt. #20. However, before Mr. Davis filed his Amended Complaint, the Honorable Brian A.
20
Tsuchida, United States Magistrate Judge, had already issued a Report and Recommendation on
21
22
February 7, 2017. Dkt. #19. As a result, Mr. Davis’s Amended Complaint was construed as a
23
motion to amend his complaint. See Dkt. #21. Objections to Judge Tsuchida’s Report and
24
Recommendations were filed by Mr. Davis on February 27, 2017. Dkt. #21. The Court finds it
25
is appropriate for Judge Tsuchida to determine if Mr. Davis’s motion to amend his complaint
26
should be granted. See Dkt. #10 at 1. Accordingly, the Clerk shall refer the motion to amend
27
28
(Dkt. #20) to Judge Tsuchida for consideration.
MINUTE ORDER- 1
1
2
DATED this 3rd day of March 2017.
3
A
4
5
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MINUTE ORDER- 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?