Northwest Sheet Metal Workers Organizational Trust et al v. 4 Seasons Mechanical et al

Filing 11

MINUTE ORDER denying Plaintiffs' 9 Motion for Default Judgment against Mike Matilla ; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by 6/23/2017 why plaintiffs' claims against 4 Seasons Mechanical should not be dismissed for failing to effect timely service. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 7 8 9 NORTHWEST SHEET METAL WORKERS ORGANIZATIONAL TRUST, et al., Plaintiffs, 10 11 12 v. C16-1736 TSZ MINUTE ORDER 4 SEASONS MECHANICAL AND MIKE MATILLA, 13 Defendants. 14 The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable 15 Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge: (1) Plaintiffs’ motion for default judgment against Mike Matilla, docket no. 9, is DENIED without prejudice. Default has not been entered against defendant Matilla, 17 see Local Civil Rule 55(b)(1), and plaintiffs have failed to submit the affidavit concerning military service required by 50 U.S.C. § 3931(b)(1). 18 (2) In addition, although the Court granted an extension of the deadline to 19 serve defendant 4 Seasons Mechanical to April 3, 2017, see Minute Order, docket no. 7, it appears that 4 Seasons Mechanical remains unserved. Accordingly, plaintiffs are 20 ORDERED to show cause by June 23, 2017, why plaintiffs’ claims against 4 Seasons Mechanical should not be dismissed for failing to effect timely service. See Fed. R. Civ. 21 P. 4(m). Absent a timely response to this Minute Order, the Court will dismiss plaintiffs’ claims against 4 Seasons Mechanical without prejudice. 16 22 23 MINUTE ORDER - 1 1 (3) record. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Minute Order to all counsel of 2 Dated this 13th day of June, 2017. 3 William M. McCool Clerk 4 5 s/Karen Dews Deputy Clerk 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 MINUTE ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?