Villaflor v. U.S. Postal Service et al
Filing
16
ORDER granting Defendant Yun Hee Lee's 14 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint; Answer due 6/9/2017 as to Ron Harrell, Yun Hee Lee, Julio Rodriguez; by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (SWT)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
9 ERNESTO VILLAFLOR,
10
11
NO. C16-1757 RSM
Plaintiff,
v.
12
U.S. POSTAL SERVICE; MEGAN
13 BRENNAN, POSTMASTER GENERAL;
YUN HEE LEE; RON HARRELL, JULIO
14
RODRIGUEZ,
15
Defendants.
16
ORDER GRANTING FEDERAL
DEFENDANTS’ UNOPPOSED
MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE
TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS’
COMPLAINT
17
18
THIS MATTER, having come before the Court upon the Federal Defendants’
19 Unopposed Motion to Extend Deadline to Respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint, the Court
20 having reviewed the pleadings and for good cause shown; it is hereby
21
ORDERED that the unopposed motion of Federal Defendants Lee, Harrell, and
22 Rodriguez is GRANTED. Federal Defendants’ responses to Plaintiffs’ Complaint shall be
23 filed by June 9, 2017.
24
25
26
27
Dated this 7th day of April 2017.
A
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
28
ORDER GRANTING FEDERAL DEFENDANTS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION
TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
C16-1757 RSM-1
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
1201 PACIFIC AVENUE, SUITE 700
TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98402
(253) 428-3800
1
2
3
Presented by:
4
5
ANNETTE L. HAYES
United States Attorney
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
/s/ Patricia D. Gugin
PATRICIA D. GUGIN, WSBA # 43458
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Attorney’s Office
1201 Pacific Avenue, Suite 700
Tacoma, Washington 98402
Phone: 253-428-3832
Fax: 253-428-3826
E-mail: pat.gugin@usdoj.gov
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER GRANTING FEDERAL DEFENDANTS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION
TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
C16-1757 RSM-2
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
1201 PACIFIC AVENUE, SUITE 700
TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98402
(253) 428-3800
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?