Kerntke v. Colvin

Filing 20

ORDER granting parties' 19 Stipulated Motion For Attorney Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA). Signed by Judge Richard A Jones. (TH)

Download PDF
1 U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE RICHARD A. JONES 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 KATHERINE M. KERNTKE, 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. 12 13 NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 14 Defendant. 15 ) No. 2:16-cv-01764-RAJ-JRC ) ) ) ) [PROPOSED] ORDER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 16 THIS MATTER having been brought before this Court upon the parties’ Stipulated 17 Motion for Equal Access to Justice Act attorneys’ fees and costs, and the Court having fully 18 considered this matter: 19 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Stipulated Motion 20 for EAJA attorney fees is Granted and Plaintiff is awarded attorneys’ fees in the amount of 21 $6,060.38 and expenses in the amount of $27.28, for a total of $6,087.66, pursuant to the Equal 22 Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, subject to any offset as described in Astrue v. Ratliff, 23 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010). Plaintiff is also awarded $13.40 in costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920. 24 ROBEY NAMBA, P.S. 1414 F Street Bellingham, WA 98225 Phone: (360) 676-2548 ORDER - 1 1 2 3 The check(s) shall be mailed to Plaintiff’s attorney’s office: Robey Namba, P.S., 1414 F Street, Bellingham, WA 98225. If it is determined that Plaintiff’s EAJA fees are not subject to any offset allowed under the Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program, the check for EAJA fees shall be made payable to Robey Namba, P.S., based upon Plaintiff’s assignment of these amounts to Plaintiff’s attorney. 4 5 DATED this 1st day of December, 2017. 6 A 7 8 The Honorable Richard A. Jones United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ROBEY NAMBA, P.S. 1414 F Street Bellingham, WA 98225 Phone: (360) 676-2548 ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?