Kerntke v. Colvin
Filing
20
ORDER granting parties' 19 Stipulated Motion For Attorney Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA). Signed by Judge Richard A Jones. (TH)
1
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE RICHARD A. JONES
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
IN THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
8
9
KATHERINE M. KERNTKE,
10
Plaintiff,
11
v.
12
13
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
14
Defendant.
15
) No. 2:16-cv-01764-RAJ-JRC
)
)
)
) [PROPOSED] ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
16
THIS MATTER having been brought before this Court upon the parties’ Stipulated
17
Motion for Equal Access to Justice Act attorneys’ fees and costs, and the Court having fully
18
considered this matter:
19
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Stipulated Motion
20
for EAJA attorney fees is Granted and Plaintiff is awarded attorneys’ fees in the amount of
21
$6,060.38 and expenses in the amount of $27.28, for a total of $6,087.66, pursuant to the Equal
22
Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, subject to any offset as described in Astrue v. Ratliff,
23
130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010). Plaintiff is also awarded $13.40 in costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920.
24
ROBEY NAMBA, P.S.
1414 F Street
Bellingham, WA 98225
Phone: (360) 676-2548
ORDER - 1
1
2
3
The check(s) shall be mailed to Plaintiff’s attorney’s office: Robey Namba, P.S., 1414 F Street,
Bellingham, WA 98225. If it is determined that Plaintiff’s EAJA fees are not subject to any
offset allowed under the Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program, the check for EAJA fees
shall be made payable to Robey Namba, P.S., based upon Plaintiff’s assignment of these
amounts to Plaintiff’s attorney.
4
5
DATED this 1st day of December, 2017.
6
A
7
8
The Honorable Richard A. Jones
United States District Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
ROBEY NAMBA, P.S.
1414 F Street
Bellingham, WA 98225
Phone: (360) 676-2548
ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?