Northwest Environmental Advocates v. U.S. Department of Commerce et al
Filing
38
MINUTE ORDER denying Plaintiff's 37 Motion for Leave to File Sur-reply. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH)
THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
7
8
9
10
11
NORTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL
ADVOCATES,
CASE NO. C16-1866-JCC
MINUTE ORDER
Plaintiff,
v.
12
13
14
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF
COMMERCE, et al.,
Defendants.
15
16
17
18
The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable John C.
Coughenour, United States District Judge:
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a surreply brief
19
(Dkt. No. 37). Plaintiffs’ believe their surreply is necessary to respond to new arguments in
20
Defendants’ reply brief in support of their motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 35). Pursuant to Local
21
Civil Rule 7(g), a surreply must be “strictly limited to addressing the request to strike.
22
Extraneous argument or a surreply filed for any other reason will not be considered.” The
23
plaintiff failed to move to strike such argument within the time permitted by Local Civil Rule
24
7(g). Plaintiff now seeks leave to file a surreply with extraneous argument. This Court finds that
25
good cause does not exist to grant this motion.
26
Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED.
MINUTE ORDER C16-1866-JCC
PAGE - 1
1
DATED this 12th day of September 2017.
2
William M. McCool
Clerk of Court
3
s/Tomas Hernandez
Deputy Clerk
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
MINUTE ORDER C16-1866-JCC
PAGE - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?