Northwest Environmental Advocates v. U.S. Department of Commerce et al
Filing
41
MINUTE ORDER granting Defendants' 40 Unopposed Motion to Extend Date for the United States' Answer, Administrative Records, and Potential Motion for Reconsideration. Any motion for reconsideration due 10/6/2017; Answer to First Amended Complaint due 10/24/2017; first part of administrative record due 10/24/2017; second part of administrative record due 11/22/2017. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (PM)
THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
7
8
9
NORTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL
ADVOCATES,
10
CASE NO. C16-1866-JCC
MINUTE ORDER
Plaintiff,
11
v.
12
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF
COMMERCE, et al.,
13
14
Defendants.
15
16
17
The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable John C.
Coughenour, United States District Judge:
18
This matter comes before the Court upon Defendants’ Unopposed Motion to Extend Date
19
for United States’ Answer, Administrative Records, and Potential Motion for Reconsideration
20
(Dkt. No. 40). The Motion is GRANTED. Defendants must file (1) any motion for
21
reconsideration by October 6, 2017; (2) their answer to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint by
22
October 24, 2017; (3) the first part of the administrative record by October 24, 2017; and (4) the
23
second part of the administrative record by November 22, 2017. The Court understands that the
24
Parties dispute whether judicial review of Claim 6 should be on the administrative record. Entry
25
of this Order does not prejudice any Party’s position on that issue.
26
//
MINUTE ORDER C16-1866-JCC
PAGE - 1
1
Dated this 2nd day of October 2017.
2
William M. McCool
Clerk of Court
3
s/Tomas Hernandez
Deputy Clerk
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
MINUTE ORDER C16-1866-JCC
PAGE - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?