Dahlstrom v. United States of America et al
Filing
74
ORDER denying as moot defendant Ronda Kaye's 61 Motion to Dismiss, signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
6
7
RAJU T. DAHLSTROM,
8
9
10
11
Plaintiff,
Case No. C16-1874RSL
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.,
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT
METCALF’S MOTION TO
DISMISS AS MOOT
Defendants.
12
13
This matter comes before the Court on the “Motion to Dismiss Party Ronda Kaye
14
Metcalf.” Dkt. # 61. On March 28, 2018, plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint
15
which substantively altered allegations against Metcalf, making clear that plaintiff is
16
asserting claims against her in her individual capacity. Although the Court disagrees with
17
plaintiff’s contention that the filing of an amended complaint automatically moots a
18
pending motion to dismiss (Dkt. # 64 at 1-2), in the circumstances presented here, at least
19
some of the issues raised in the motion were impacted by the amendment. Metcalf offered
20
arguments in reply that appropriately addressed the new allegations of the Second
21
Amended Complaint but to which plaintiff had not opportunity to respond. The motion to
22
dismiss is therefore DENIED as moot.
23
Plaintiff filed two responses to Metcalf’s motion. Multiple response memoranda
24
are not authorized by the local civil rules of this district. In addition, plaintiff’s second,
25
lengthier response violated LCR 10(e)(1). The twenty-three page memorandum is single-
26
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT METCALF’S
MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT - 1
1
spaced in less than 12 point font. In addition, the number and length of footnotes was
2
excessive, triggering the Court’s discretion under LCR 7(e)(6) to ignore the information
3
contained therein. In the future, memoranda that so clearly violate the rules of this district
4
will be stricken.
5
6
Dated this 4th day of May, 2018.
A
7
Robert S. Lasnik
United States District Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT METCALF’S
MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?