Chen et al v. The City of Redmond, et al

Filing 309

ORDER: The court construes the document at dkt. 307 as Ms. Chen's response to the court's December 6, 2022 order directing the parties to meet and confer. The court ORDERS the parties to meet and confer and file a joint status report by no later than 3/18/2023, that includes a proposal for how this matter should proceed in view of the Ninth Circuit's opinion vacating and remanding the matter to this court and an accompanying timeline for the proposed course of action. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (LH) Modified on 1/17/2023 - cc: Plaintiffs Chen and Lian via US mail (LH).

Download PDF
Case 2:16-cv-01877-JLR Document 309 Filed 01/17/23 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 10 SUSAN CHEN, et al., 11 v. 12 13 ORDER NATALIE D’AMICO et al., Defendants. 14 15 Plaintiffs, CASE NO. C16-1877JLR On December 6, 2022, the court ordered the parties to meet and confer and file a 16 joint status report no later than January 13, 2023 with a proposal for how this matter 17 should proceed and a proposed timeline. (See 12/6/22 Order (Dkt. # 304).) In response, 18 Defendant Washington State Department of Children Youth and Family (“DCYF”) 1 and 19 20 21 22 1 DCYF is the successor-in-interest to the Washington State Department of Social and Health Services. See, e.g., RCW 43.216.906. ORDER - 1 Case 2:16-cv-01877-JLR Document 309 Filed 01/17/23 Page 2 of 3 1 pro se Plaintiff Susan Chen have filed separate status reports. 2 (DCYF Status Report 2 (Dkt. # 305); Chen Status Report (Dkt. # 307)). Plaintiff J.L., Ms. Chen’s minor son, 3 does not have legal representation and did not file a status report. (See Dkt.); see also 4 Johns v. Cnty. of San Diego, 114 F.3d 874, 877 (9th Cir. 1997) (prohibiting pro se 5 parents or guardians from representing a minor child without assistance of counsel). 6 DCYF and Ms. Chen represent that they held a telephone call on January 11, 2023 7 but were unable to reach agreement regarding how the matter should proceed or a 8 proposed timeline. (DCYF Status Report at 1-2; Chen Status Report at 2.) Both parties 9 represent that they were unable to reach agreement in large part because Plaintiffs do not 10 yet have, but intend to obtain, legal counsel. (See DCYF Status Report at 1-2; Chen 11 Status Report at 1-2.) 12 In light of Ms. Chen’s pro se status and limited English proficiency, as well as 13 J.L.’s lack of legal representation, the court grants Plaintiffs an additional 60 days to 14 obtain legal counsel. (See Chen Status Report at 1.) Accordingly, the court ORDERS the 15 parties to meet and confer and file a joint status report by no later than March 18, 2023, 16 that includes a proposal for how this matter should proceed in view of the Ninth Circuit’s 17 opinion vacating and remanding the matter to this court and an accompanying timeline 18 for the proposed course of action. 19 20 21 22 2 Ms. Chen’s filing is noted as a motion to extend the deadline to meet and confer. (See Dkt.) The court construes this document as Ms. Chen’s response to the court’s December 6, 2022 order directing the parties to meet and confer. (See 12/6/22 Order.) ORDER - 2 Case 2:16-cv-01877-JLR Document 309 Filed 01/17/23 Page 3 of 3 1 Dated this 17th day of January, 2023. 2 A 3 JAMES L. ROBART United States District Judge 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ORDER - 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?