Chen et al v. The City of Redmond, et al

Filing 319

MINUTE ORDER: The court is in receipt of Ms. Chen's submission and, for good cause shown, GRANTS her motion for an extension of time to respond (Dkt. # 318 ). If Ms. Chen has additional records responsive to the court's April 6, 2023 order, she must submit them for in camera review no later than April 28, 2023. Authorized Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (LH) (cc: Plaintiffs Chen and Lian via US mail) Modified to correct Judge's endorsement on 4/21/2023 (LH).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 10 11 12 13 SUSAN CHEN, et al., v. 16 17 MINUTE ORDER NATALIE D'AMICO, et al., Defendants. 14 15 Plaintiffs, CASE NO. C16-1877JLR The following minute order is made by the direction of the court, the Honorable James L. Robart: Before the court is Plaintiff Susan Chen’s motion for an extension of time to 18 respond to the court’s April 6, 2023 order directing Ms. Chen to submit certain records 19 for in camera review. (Mot. (Dkt. # 318); 4/6/23 Order (Dkt. # 317).) Ms. Chen, who 20 proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis, states that she missed the court’s April 14, 2023 21 deadline due to illness and has submitted some of the requested documents for in camera 22 review on April 20, 2023. (Mot. ¶¶ 3-6, 8.) MINUTE ORDER - 1 1 The court is in receipt of Ms. Chen’s submission and, for good cause shown, 2 GRANTS her motion for an extension of time to respond (Dkt. # 318). If Ms. Chen has 3 additional records responsive to the court’s April 6, 2023 order, she must submit them for 4 in camera review no later than April 28, 2023 in conformity with the court’s prior order. 5 Filed and entered this 21st day of April, 2023. 6 RAVI SUBRAMANIAN Clerk of Court 7 s/ Ashleigh Drecktrah Deputy Clerk 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 MINUTE ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?