Chen et al v. The City of Redmond, et al
Filing
333
ORDER: The Court appoints Naixiang Lian as Litigation Guardian for purposes of pursuing J.L.'s claims herein. In the event there is a settlement offer, counsel for Petitioner shall seek the appointment of a settlement guardian ad litem. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (LH) (cc: Chen and Lian via US mail)
Case 2:16-cv-01877-JLR Document 333 Filed 06/27/23 Page 1 of 2
1
Honorable James L. Robart
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
8
9
10
SUSAN CHEN, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
11
12
13
Case No.: 2:16-cv-01877-JLR
v.
NATALIE DAMICO et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
[PROPOSED] ORDER APPOINTING
NAIXIANG LIAN GUARDIAN AD LITEM FOR
PLAINTIFF J.L.
Case No. 2:16-cv-01877-JLR
DM1\14237839.1
[PROPOSED] ORDER APPOINTING
NAIXIANG LIAN GUARDIAN AD
LITEM FOR PLAINTIFF J.L.
Case 2:16-cv-01877-JLR Document 333 Filed 06/27/23 Page 2 of 2
1
2
3
THIS MATTER came before the Court upon the application of Petitioner Naixiang Lian
for appointment as Litigation Guardian for Petitioners minor child, J.L.
The court finds that J.L. is a minor under the age of fourteen years and may appear in
4
this cause through a Litigation Guardian. The Court also finds that Mr. Lian is a proper and
5
responsible person to be appointed as Litigation Guardian for the purpose of instituting and
6
prosecuting this action on J.L.s behalf.
7
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED:
8
Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 17(c), the Court appoints Naixiang Lian as Litigation
9
10
11
12
13
Guardian for purposes of pursuing J.L.s claims herein.
In the event there is a settlement offer, counsel for Petitioner shall seek the appointment
of a settlement guardian ad litem under LCR 17(c).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: June 27, 2023
14
Hon. James L. Robart
United States District Judge
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
[PROPOSED] ORDER APPOINTING
NAIXIANG LIAN GUARDIAN AD LITEM FOR
PLAINTIFF J.L.
Case No. 2:16-cv-01877-JLR
DM1\14237839.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?