Chen et al v. The City of Redmond, et al
Filing
368
ORDER. The Court hereby APPOINTS Colin G. Prince and John Barto McEntire, IV as pro bono counsel for Ms. Chen. Counsel are DIRECTED to appear in this matter within ten (10) calendar days. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (SB) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
8
9
10
SUSAN CHEN, et al.,
11
v.
12
13
16
17
ORDER
NATALIE D'AMICO, et al.,
Defendants.
14
15
Plaintiffs,
CASE NO. C16-1877JLR
This matter is before the court on Plaintiff Susan Chen’s motion to appoint pro
bono counsel (Mot. (Dkt. # 354)).
The Court hereby GRANTS Ms. Chen’s motion and APPOINTS Colin G. Prince
18
and John Barto McEntire, IV of Connelly Law Offices PLLC, 2301 N. 30th Street,
19
Tacoma, Washington 98403 (cprince@connelly-law.com and jmcentire@connelly-
20
law.com, (253) 593-5100), as pro bono counsel for Ms. Chen pursuant to the Amended
21
Plan of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington for the
22
Representation of Pro Se Litigants in Civil Rights Actions. See General Order 07-23.
ORDER - 1
1
Counsel are DIRECTED to appear in this matter within ten (10) calendar days. If
2
counsel are unable for a reason set forth in the applicable rules to assume this
3
representation, a motion for relief from appointment should immediately be filed with the
4
court.
5
In the event Ms. Chen prevails in this matter, appointed counsel may move for an
6
award of attorney’s fees under any applicable authority. The court, however, is unable to
7
assure counsel of compensation from any source.
8
9
10
The Clerk is DIRECTED to send a copy of this order to Ms. Chen and to
appointed counsel Colin G. Prince and John Barto McEntire, IV.
Dated this 22nd day of November, 2024.
A
11
JAMES L. ROBART
United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?