Chen et al v. The City of Redmond, et al

Filing 60

ORDER re: Plaintiffs' 57 Motion to clarify the court's 10/16/2017 order. The court CLARIFIES that its ruling extended only to striking Plaintiffs' allegations and claims against the City and to Paragraph 23 of the complaint as to a ll defendants. (See 10/16/17 Order at 4 (noting that Plaintiffs amended their complaint as of right against other defendants), 5; Mot. at 4-5.) The court's clarification is without prejudice, however, to any other defendant raising any issues with the operative complaint. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE

8
9
10

SUSAN CHEN, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

11
v.

CASE NO. C16-1877JLR
ORDER ON MOTION TO
CLARIFY

12
13

NATALIE D’AMICO, et al.,
Defendants.

14
15

Before the court is Plaintiffs Susan Chen, Naixiang Lian, J.L., and L.L.’s

16

(collectively, “Plaintiffs”) motion to clarify the court’s October 16, 2017, order. (Mot.

17

(Dkt. # 57); 10/16/17 Order (Dkt. # 53).) Plaintiffs seek clarification that the court’s

18

order striking their amended complaint applied only to their allegations and claims

19

against Defendant City of Redmond (“the City”). (Mot. at 1; see also FAC (Dkt. # 21).)

20

The court CLARIFIES that its ruling extended only to striking Plaintiffs’ allegations and

21

claims against the City and to Paragraph 23 of the complaint as to all defendants. (See

22

10/16/17 Order at 4 (noting that Plaintiffs amended their complaint as of right against

ORDER - 1

1

other defendants), 5; Mot. at 4-5.) The court’s clarification is without prejudice,

2

however, to any other defendant raising any issues with the operative complaint.

3

Dated this 22nd day of October, 2017.

4
5

A

6

JAMES L. ROBART
United States District Judge

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

ORDER - 2