Kautsman et al v. Carrington Mortgage Services LLC et al
Filing
51
ORDER granting Plaintiffs' 42 Motion to Seal Exhibits M-R to the Declaration of Jason E Anderson Filed in Support of Class Certification. Signed by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH)
THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
7
8
9
NIKOLAY KAUTSMAN, et al.,
10
Plaintiffs,
v.
11
CASE NO. C16-1940-JCC
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
SEAL
CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES,
LLC, et al.,
12
13
Defendants.
14
15
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ motion to seal (Dkt. No. 42). Having
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
thoroughly considered the parties’ briefing and the relevant record, the Court hereby GRANTS
the motion (Dkt. No. 42) for the reasons explained herein.
I.
BACKGROUND
Included with Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification (Dkt. No. 34) is a declaration from
Jason Anderson (Dkt. No. 37). The declaration contains a number of exhibits (Dkt. Nos. 37, 39).
Exhibits M through R reflect Carrington Home Solutions, L.P.’s Property Preservation
Guidelines (Dkt. No. 39.) Those exhibits, if disclosed to the public, would place Carrington at a
competitive disadvantage because the exhibits contain proprietary information about how the
company maximizes revenue and minimizes costs on the properties it manages.
Carrington’s Property Preservation guidelines were provided to Mr. Anderson during
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SEAL
C16-1940-JCC
PAGE - 1
1
discovery under a protective order (Dkt. No. 23). That order provides that any documents that
2
Carrington labels as “confidential” would not be filed unless done so under seal. (Dkt. No. 23 at
3
4–5.) Carrington labeled the Preservation Guidelines as confidential (Dkt. Nos. 39-1–39-6).
4
Correspondingly, Plaintiffs now ask that this confidential information be placed under seal (Dkt.
5
No. 42). The motion is unopposed by Defendants. (Dkt. No. 45.)
6
II.
7
DISCUSSION
“Historically, courts have recognized a ‘general right to inspect and copy public records
8
and documents, including judicial records and documents.’” Kamakana v. City & Cnty. of
9
Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435
10
U.S. 589, 597 (1978)). That right is reduced when applied to confidential and proprietary
11
business records. Id. at 1179. This is particularly true for records attached to nondispositive
12
motions. In re Midland Nat. Life Ins. Co. Annuity Sales Practices Litig., 686 F.3d 1115 (9th Cir.
13
2012).
14
The motion at issue in the instant matter is a class certification motion (Dkt. No. 34).
15
While courts may consider the merits of a party’s underlying claim in ruling on such motions,
16
the primary consideration for the Court is whether the class device is appropriate. Wal-Mart
17
Stores, Inc. v. Dukes, 564 U.S. 338, 348–49 (2011). This Court considers the class certification
18
motion here to be nondispositive. On this basis, it applies the “good cause” standard articulated
19
in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c). Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1180. Only a “particularized
20
showing” of harm from disclosure is required. Id.
21
The Court has reviewed the records at issue and concluded that a showing of harm has
22
been made in the instant matter. Disclosure of the competitively-sensitive information included
23
in the records would cause irreparable harm to Carrington Home Solutions because it would
24
provide Carrington’s competitors information about how it maximizes revenues and minimizes
25
costs on property it manages. Good cause exists to grant Plaintiffs’ motion.
26
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SEAL
C16-1940-JCC
PAGE - 2
1
2
III.
CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs’ motion to seal (Dkt. No. 42) is GRANTED. The
3
Clerk is DIRECTED to maintain under seal Exhibits M–R of Mr. Anderson’s declaration (Dkt.
4
Nos. 39-1–39-6).
5
6
DATED this 19th day of September 2017.
A
7
8
9
John C. Coughenour
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SEAL
C16-1940-JCC
PAGE - 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?