ME2 Productions, Inc v. Doe 1 et al
Filing
29
ORDER REINSTATING CLAIMS against Gerald W. Boerner; re Plaintiff's 27 Motion to Set Aside Dismissal, by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
6
7
ME2 PRODUCTIONS, INC.,
8
9
10
11
Plaintiff,
Case No. C16-1955RSL
v.
DAVE COOPER, et al.,
ORDER REINSTATING CLAIMS
AGAINST GERALD W. BOERNER
Defendants.
12
13
This matter comes before the Court on plaintiff’s “Motion to Set Aside Dismissal.”
14
Dkt. # 27. On March 16, 2017, the Court granted an extension of time in which to affect
15
service in this matter. Plaintiff was given “an additional forty-five days, until May 5,
16
2017, to file proofs of waiver as to all defendants or a second motion for extension of
17
time detailing the efforts made toward effecting personal service.” Dkt. # 11 at 2. Plaintiff
18
failed to timely file proof of service or waiver as to defendant Gerald W. Boerner, and the
19
claims against him were dismissed on May 11, 2017.
20
Plaintiff has now filed proof that service was in fact achieved within the time
21
allowed. The failure to comply with the Court’s order requiring filing by a certain date is
22
nevertheless troubling. Inadvertence in light of the Court’s repeated indications that it will
23
strictly enforce the service deadlines does not constitute good cause. Because this is the
24
first time this particular situation has arisen (at least before the undersigned), the motion
25
to set aside is GRANTED. The claims against Gerald W. Boerner are hereby reinstated.
26
ORDER REINSTATING CLAIMS AGAINST
GERALD W. BOERNER
1
Counsel is advised, however, that future failures to comply with service requirements and
2
orders of the Court will not be excused absent good cause.
3
4
Dated this 12th day of May, 2017.
5
A
6
Robert S. Lasnik
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
ORDER REINSTATING CLAIMS AGAINST
GERALD W. BOERNER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?