HTC Corporation et al v. Nokia Corporation et al

Filing 28

ORDER Approving Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint; re parties' 27 Stipulated Motion; Defendants shall have up to and including July 26, 2017, within which to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint and to delay issuance of a scheduling order, by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (SWT)

1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE

6
7
8
9

HTC CORPORATION and HTC AMERICA,
INC.,

10
11
12
13
14

Plaintiffs,
v.
NOKIA CORPORATION; NOKIA
TECHNOLOGIES OY; NOKIA SOLUTIONS
AND NETWORKS OY; NOKIA SOLUTIONS
AND NETWORKS US LLC; NOKIA USA INC.;
ALCATEL-LUCENT S.A.; and ALCATELLUCENT USA INC.,

CASE NO.: 2:16-cv-1984-RSM
STIPULATED MOTION AND
ORDER APPROVING EXTENSION
OF TIME TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT

15
16

Defendants.

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

Plaintiffs HTC Corporation and HTC America, Inc. (collectively, “HTC” or “Plaintiffs”)
and Defendants Nokia Corporation, Nokia Technologies Oy, Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy,
Nokia Solutions and Networks US LLC, Nokia USA Inc., Alcatel-Lucent S.A., and AlcatelLucent USA Inc. (collectively, “Nokia” or “Defendants”) hereby stipulate:
WHEREAS, on December 29, 2016, Plaintiffs filed a complaint in this action against
Defendants, alleging breach of contract, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing,
and promissory estoppel (“Complaint”);
WHEREAS, on January 18, 2017, this Court approved the parties’ January 13, 2017
stipulation whereby Defendants accepted service of summons in this matters through their

27
STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER
EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT
2:16-CV-1984-RSM

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5100
Seattle, WA 98104-7036
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

1

counsel at Alston & Bird LLP and the deadline for all Defendants to answer or otherwise

2

respond to the Complaint was extended to April 12, 2017;

3

WHEREAS, the parties believe an additional extension of Defendants’ deadline to

4

respond will facilitate settlement discussions consistent with this Court’s expectation that parties

5

attempt to voluntarily resolve their disputes early in the judicial proceedings;

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

WHEREAS, the parties do not seek this extension of time for the purpose of delay, but
for good cause shown and so that justice may be done. Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b), 16(b)(2).
NOW THEREFORE, the parties to this stipulation agree, subject to the Court’s approval,
as follows:
1.

Defendants shall have to and including July 26, 2017, within which to answer,

move or otherwise respond to the Complaint.
2.

The parties shall meet and confer regarding a Rule 26(f) joint status report by July

26, 2017, which shall be filed with the Court no later than August 4, 2017.

14
15

Dated: April 3, 2017

16

/s/ James C. Yoon
Gregory L. Watts, WSBA #43995
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI

Professional Corporation
701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5100
Seattle, WA 98104-7036
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

17
18
19
20

James C. Yoon, Admitted Pro Hac Vice

21

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI

Professional Corporation
650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

22
23
24
25

Attorney for Plaintiffs HTC Corporation and
HTC America, Inc.

26
27
STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER APPROVING
EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
2:16-CV-1984-RSM

-1-

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5100
Seattle, WA 98104-7036
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

1

Dated: April 3, 2017

2

/s/ Michael D. McKay
Michael D. McKay, WSBA # 7040
/s/ Thomas M. Brennan
Thomas M. Brennan, WSBA # 30662

3
4

McKAY CHADWELL, PLLC
600 University Street, Suite 1601
Seattle, WA 98101
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]

5
6
7
8
9

Attorneys for Defendants Nokia Corporation,
Nokia Technologies Oy, Nokia Solutions and
Networks Oy, Nokia Solutions and Networks
US LLC, Nokia USA Inc., Alcatel-Lucent S.A.,
and Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc.

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER APPROVING
EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
2:16-CV-1984-RSM

-2-

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5100
Seattle, WA 98104-7036
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

1
2

ORDER
GOOD CAUSE HAVING BEEN SHOWN, it is hereby ordered that Defendants shall

3

have to and including July 26, 2017, within which to answer, move or otherwise respond to the

4

Complaint and to delay issuance of a scheduling order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(2).

5

Dated this 7th day of April 2017.

6

A

7

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

Presented by:
James C. Yoon, Admitted Pro Hac Vice
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
Professional Corporation
650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs HTC Corporation
and HTC America, Inc

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER APPROVING
EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
2:16-CV-1984-RSM

-3-

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5100
Seattle, WA 98104-7036
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]