Donahue v. Red Robin International Inc et al

Filing 70

ORDER directing Red Robin to file a response to Mr. Donahue's Surreply (Dkt. No. 68 ) no later than Friday, April 27, 2018. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (TH)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 10 DARREN DONAHUE, Plaintiff, 11 CASE NO. C17-0023JLR ORDER v. 12 13 RED ROBIN INTERNATIONAL INC., et al., 14 Defendants. 15 On April 18, 2018, Plaintiff Darren Donahue filed a surreply to Defendants Harold 16 Hart, Red Robin International Inc., and Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc.’s (collectively, 17 “Red Robin”) motion for summary judgment. (See Surreply (Dkt. # 68); MSJ (Dkt. 18 # 29).) In the surreply, Mr. Donahue requests that the court strike two exhibits submitted 19 with Red Robin’s reply. (Surreply at 1.) Mr. Donahue contends that Red Robin “failed 20 to produce either of these documents in discovery although both were requested.” (Id.) 21 Because the alleged failure to turn over these documents has unfairly prejudiced Mr. 22 ORDER - 1 1 Donahue, he asks the court not to consider either exhibit when ruling on Red Robin’s 2 motion. (See id. at 2.) 3 Under Local Civil Rule 7(g)(4), “[n]o response [to a surreply] shall be filed unless 4 requested by the court.” Local Rules W.D. Wash. LCR 7(g)(4). The court ORDERS Red 5 Robin to file a response to Mr. Donahue’s surreply no later than Friday, April 27, 2018, 6 at 5:00 P.M. Red Robin shall limit its response to no more than three (3) pages and may 7 only address Mr. Donahue’s contention that the two exhibits were requested but not 8 turned over in discovery. (See Surreply at 1-2.) Mr. Donahue shall not file a response. 9 Dated this 20th day of April, 2018. 10 11 A 12 JAMES L. ROBART United States District Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?