Patel v. Seattle Genetics, Inc. et al
Filing
8
ORDER Appointing Lead Plaintiff and Approving Selection of Counsel; re 6 Motion to Appoint Carl Johnson as lead plaintiff and approve counsel, by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (SWT)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
6
7
8
No. C17-41 RSM
SAMIT PATEL, individually and on behalf
9
of all others similarly situated,
10
Plaintiff,
11
v.
ORDER APPOINTING
LEAD PLAINTIFF AND APPROVING
SELECTION OF COUNSEL
12
SEATTLE GENETICS, INC., CLAY B.
13 SIEGALL, and TODD E. SIMPSON,
14
Defendants.
15
16
17
18
The Court has considered the motions for appointment of lead plaintiff and approval of
counsel made by competing movants. The Court finds oral argument unnecessary and for good
cause shown, hereby ORDERS as follows:
19
20
21
22
:
I.
NEWLY-FILED OR TRANSFERRED ACTIONS
1.
When a case that arises out of the subject matter of this action is hereinafter filed
in this Court or transferred to this Court from another court, the Clerk of this Court shall:
23
(a) file a copy of this Order in the separate file for such action;
24
(b) mail a copy of this Order to the attorneys for the plaintiff(s) in the newly
25
filed or transferred case and to any new defendant(s) in the newly-filed or
26
transferred case; and
27
ORDER APPOINTING
LEAD PLAINTIFF AND APPROVING
SELECTION OF COUNSEL
No. C17-41 RSM
-1-
1
(c) make the appropriate entry in the Master Docket.
2
2.
Each new case that arises out of the subject matter of this Action and that is filed
3
in this Court or transferred to this Court shall be consolidated with this action and this Order
4
shall apply thereto, unless a party objecting to this Order or any provision of this Order shall,
5
within ten (10) days after the date upon which a copy of this Order is served on counsel for such
6
party, files an application for relief from this Order or any provision herein and this Court deems
7
it appropriate to grant such application.
8
II.
9
APPOINTMENT OF LEAD PLAINTIFF AND LEAD COUNSEL
3.
Having reviewed all pending motions, the Court hereby appoints movant Carl
10
Johnson (“Johnson”) as Lead Plaintiff for the class (the “Class”). Johnson satisfies all of the
11
requirements for lead plaintiff pursuant to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995
12
(“PSLRA”).
13
4.
Lead Plaintiff, pursuant to Section 21D(a)(3)(B)(v), has selected and retained the
14
law firm of Pomerantz LLP as Lead Counsel and the Law Offices of Clifford A. Cantor, P.C. as
15
Liaison Counsel for the Class. The Court approves Lead Plaintiff’s selection of Counsel for the
16
Class.
17
18
5.
Lead Counsel shall have the following responsibilities and duties, to be carried
out either personally or through counsel whom Lead Counsel shall designate:
19
(a)
to coordinate the briefing and argument of motions;
20
(b)
to coordinate the conduct of discovery proceedings;
21
(c)
to coordinate the examination of witnesses in depositions;
22
(d)
to coordinate the selection of counsel to act as spokesperson at pretrial
23
24
conferences;
(e)
25
26
to call meetings of the plaintiffs’ counsel as they deem necessary and
appropriate from time to time;
(f)
to conduct all settlement negotiations with counsel for defendants;
27
ORDER APPOINTING
LEAD PLAINTIFF AND APPROVING
SELECTION OF COUNSEL
No. C17-41 RSM
-2-
1
(g)
to conduct or direct the pretrial discovery proceedings and the preparation
2
for trial of this matter and to delegate work responsibilities to selected
3
counsel as may be required; and
4
(h)
5
6
to supervise any other matters concerning the prosecution, resolution, or
settlement of this action.
6.
No motion, request for discovery, or other pretrial proceedings shall be initiated
7
or filed by any plaintiff in the Class without the approval of Lead Counsel, so as to prevent
8
duplicative pleadings or discovery by plaintiffs. No settlement negotiations shall be conducted
9
without the approval of Lead Counsel.
10
11
12
13
14
7.
Counsel in any related action that is consolidated with this Action shall be bound
by this organization of plaintiffs’ counsel.
8.
Lead Counsel shall have the responsibility of receiving and disseminating Court
orders and notices, other than as may be served through this Court’s ECF System.
9.
Lead Counsel shall be the contact between plaintiffs’ counsel and defendants’
15
counsel, as well as the spokesperson for plaintiffs’ counsel, and shall direct and coordinate the
16
activities of plaintiffs’ counsel.
17
10.
Other than as served through the Court’s ECF System, defendants shall effect
18
service of papers on plaintiffs by serving a copy on each of Lead Counsel by overnight mail
19
service, e-mail, or hand delivery. Lead Counsel may serve, as they deem appropriate, copies of
20
such papers on any other plaintiffs’ counsel by e-mail or first-class mail. Lead Counsel shall
21
effect service of papers on defendants by serving a copy on defendants’ counsel by overnight
22
mail service, e-mail, or hand delivery.
23
11.
During the pendency of this litigation, or until further order of this Court, the
24
parties shall exercise the required diligence to preserve all documents within their possession,
25
custody, or control, including ESI, containing information that is relevant to the subject matter of
26
the Action.
27
ORDER APPOINTING
LEAD PLAINTIFF AND APPROVING
SELECTION OF COUNSEL
No. C17-41 RSM
-3-
1
Dated this 7th day of April 2017
2
3
A
4
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Presented by:
12
s/ Cliff Cantor
By: Cliff Cantor, WSBA # 17893
LAW OFFICES OF CLIFFORD A. CANTOR, P.C.
627 208th Ave SE
Sammamish, WA 98074
Tel: (425) 868-7813
Fax: (425) 732-3752
Email: cliff.cantor@outlook.com
13
14
15
16
17
18
One of Counsel for Movant and
Proposed Liaison Counsel for the Class
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
ORDER APPOINTING
LEAD PLAINTIFF AND APPROVING
SELECTION OF COUNSEL
No. C17-41 RSM
-4-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?