Schilling et al v. JPMorgan Chase & Co. et al
Filing
26
ORDER granting 25 Stipulated Motion to stay proceedings by Judge Ricardo S Martinez.(RS)
Hon. Ricardo S. Martinez
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE
7
8
9
GEORGE L. SCHILLING and SHU Y.
SCHILLING, husband and wife,
10
Plaintiff,
CASE: 2:17-cv-00060-RSM
11
12
13
ORDER ON STIPULATION TO STAY
PROCEEDINGS
vs.
JPMORGAN CHASE, d/b/a CHASE BANK, a
national bank, TRANSUNION, LLC,
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTION
INC., and EQUIFAX INC.,
14
Defendants.
15
16
17
Based upon the Stipulation of the undersigned Parties and the Court having reviewed the
file and records herein, NOW THEREFORE,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that:
18
1. The Motion for Stipulated Order staying any further litigation (including the
19
20
deadlines for initial disclosures, the Joint Report and meetings required under FRCP
Rule 16 and 26) in this proceeding until 90-days after the Court issues a ruling on
21
JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.’s Motion to Dismiss (Docket 16) is granted while the
22
Court considers the Motion. The Court will postpone the filing of the FRCP Rule
23
26/26 Joint Report currently due on March 27, 2017 and re-set the deadline for a date
24
ORDER ON STIPULATION TO
STAY PROCEEDINGS
2:17-cv-00060-RSM
1
BARRAZA LAW PLLC
14245-F AMBAUM BLVD SW
SEATTLE WA 98166
Tel. 206-933-7861
Fax 206-933-7863
1
at least 90-days after it issues a ruling on JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.’s Motion to
2
Dismiss. All other dates will be re-set accordingly as provided in the FRCP.
3
2. To the extent JPMorgan Chase & Co. is named as a defendant, it is dismissed with
prejudice and JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. is the proper defendant.
4
5
DATED this 20 day of March 2017.
6
A
7
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Presented by:
By: s/ Vicente Omar Barraza
Vicente Omar Barraza, WSBA 43589
Barraza Law PLLC
14245-F Ambaum Blvd SW
Burien, WA 98166
Telephone: (206) 933-7861
Fax: (206) 933-7863
E-mail:
omar@barrazalaw.com
Of Attorneys for Plaintiff George and Shu Schilling
By: s/ Frederick Alan Haist
Fred B. Burnside
Frederick Alan Haist
Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
1201 3rd Ave., Ste. 2200
Seattle, WA 98101-3045
Telephone: (206) 622-3150
Email: FredBurnside@dwt.com
frederickhaist@dwt.com
Of Attorneys for Defendant JPMorgan Chase & Co.
By: s/ Rachel L. Dunnington
Rachel L. Dunnington, WSBA No. 47021
STOEL RIVES LLP
600 University Street, Suite 3600
Seattle, WA 98101
Telephone: (206) 624-0900
ORDER ON STIPULATION TO
STAY PROCEEDINGS
2:17-cv-00060-RSM
2
BARRAZA LAW PLLC
14245-F AMBAUM BLVD SW
SEATTLE WA 98166
Tel. 206-933-7861
Fax 206-933-7863
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Fax: (206) 386-7500
Of Attorneys for Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
By: s/ Douglas L. Clark
Douglas L. Clark
Jones Day
4655 Executive Dr., Suite 1500
San Diego, CA 92121
Office +1.858.703.3133
Fax +1.844.345.3178
dlclark@jonesday.com
Of Attorneys for Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
By: s/ Katherine E. Carlton Robinson
Katherine E. Carlton Robinson
Schuckit Associates
4545 Northwestern Dr.
Zionsville, IN 46077
Telephone: (317) 363-2400
Email: krobinson@schuckitlaw.com
Of Attorneys for Defendant Trans Union, LLC
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
By: s/ George William Akers Jr.
George William Akers Jr.
Montgomery Purdue Blankinship & Austin
701 5th Ave., Ste. 5500
Seattle, WA 98104-7096
Telephone: (206) 682-7090
Email: akers@mpba.com
Of Attorneys for Defendant Trans Union, LLC
By: s/ Jeffrey M. Edelson
Jeffrey M. Edelson, WSBA No. 37361
Markowitz Herbold PC
Pacwest Center
1211 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 3000
Portland, OR 97204-3730
JeffEdelson@MarkowitzHerbold.com
Of Attorneys for Defendant Equifax Inc.
20
21
22
23
24
ORDER ON STIPULATION TO
STAY PROCEEDINGS
2:17-cv-00060-RSM
3
BARRAZA LAW PLLC
14245-F AMBAUM BLVD SW
SEATTLE WA 98166
Tel. 206-933-7861
Fax 206-933-7863
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?