Schilling et al v. JPMorgan Chase & Co. et al

Filing 26

ORDER granting 25 Stipulated Motion to stay proceedings by Judge Ricardo S Martinez.(RS)

Download PDF
Hon. Ricardo S. Martinez 1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 9 GEORGE L. SCHILLING and SHU Y. SCHILLING, husband and wife, 10 Plaintiff, CASE: 2:17-cv-00060-RSM 11 12 13 ORDER ON STIPULATION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS vs. JPMORGAN CHASE, d/b/a CHASE BANK, a national bank, TRANSUNION, LLC, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTION INC., and EQUIFAX INC., 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 Based upon the Stipulation of the undersigned Parties and the Court having reviewed the file and records herein, NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that: 18 1. The Motion for Stipulated Order staying any further litigation (including the 19 20 deadlines for initial disclosures, the Joint Report and meetings required under FRCP Rule 16 and 26) in this proceeding until 90-days after the Court issues a ruling on 21 JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.’s Motion to Dismiss (Docket 16) is granted while the 22 Court considers the Motion. The Court will postpone the filing of the FRCP Rule 23 26/26 Joint Report currently due on March 27, 2017 and re-set the deadline for a date 24 ORDER ON STIPULATION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS 2:17-cv-00060-RSM 1 BARRAZA LAW PLLC 14245-F AMBAUM BLVD SW SEATTLE WA 98166 Tel. 206-933-7861 Fax 206-933-7863 1 at least 90-days after it issues a ruling on JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.’s Motion to 2 Dismiss. All other dates will be re-set accordingly as provided in the FRCP. 3 2. To the extent JPMorgan Chase & Co. is named as a defendant, it is dismissed with prejudice and JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. is the proper defendant. 4 5 DATED this 20 day of March 2017. 6 A 7 RICARDO S. MARTINEZ CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Presented by: By: s/ Vicente Omar Barraza Vicente Omar Barraza, WSBA 43589 Barraza Law PLLC 14245-F Ambaum Blvd SW Burien, WA 98166 Telephone: (206) 933-7861 Fax: (206) 933-7863 E-mail: omar@barrazalaw.com Of Attorneys for Plaintiff George and Shu Schilling By: s/ Frederick Alan Haist Fred B. Burnside Frederick Alan Haist Davis Wright Tremaine LLP 1201 3rd Ave., Ste. 2200 Seattle, WA 98101-3045 Telephone: (206) 622-3150 Email: FredBurnside@dwt.com frederickhaist@dwt.com Of Attorneys for Defendant JPMorgan Chase & Co. By: s/ Rachel L. Dunnington Rachel L. Dunnington, WSBA No. 47021 STOEL RIVES LLP 600 University Street, Suite 3600 Seattle, WA 98101 Telephone: (206) 624-0900 ORDER ON STIPULATION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS 2:17-cv-00060-RSM 2 BARRAZA LAW PLLC 14245-F AMBAUM BLVD SW SEATTLE WA 98166 Tel. 206-933-7861 Fax 206-933-7863 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Fax: (206) 386-7500 Of Attorneys for Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. By: s/ Douglas L. Clark Douglas L. Clark Jones Day 4655 Executive Dr., Suite 1500 San Diego, CA 92121 Office +1.858.703.3133 Fax +1.844.345.3178 dlclark@jonesday.com Of Attorneys for Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. By: s/ Katherine E. Carlton Robinson Katherine E. Carlton Robinson Schuckit Associates 4545 Northwestern Dr. Zionsville, IN 46077 Telephone: (317) 363-2400 Email: krobinson@schuckitlaw.com Of Attorneys for Defendant Trans Union, LLC 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 By: s/ George William Akers Jr. George William Akers Jr. Montgomery Purdue Blankinship & Austin 701 5th Ave., Ste. 5500 Seattle, WA 98104-7096 Telephone: (206) 682-7090 Email: akers@mpba.com Of Attorneys for Defendant Trans Union, LLC By: s/ Jeffrey M. Edelson Jeffrey M. Edelson, WSBA No. 37361 Markowitz Herbold PC Pacwest Center 1211 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 3000 Portland, OR 97204-3730 JeffEdelson@MarkowitzHerbold.com Of Attorneys for Defendant Equifax Inc. 20 21 22 23 24 ORDER ON STIPULATION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS 2:17-cv-00060-RSM 3 BARRAZA LAW PLLC 14245-F AMBAUM BLVD SW SEATTLE WA 98166 Tel. 206-933-7861 Fax 206-933-7863

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?