Schilling et al v. JPMorgan Chase & Co. et al
Filing
33
STIPULATION AND ORDER dismissing defendant Trans Union LLC only by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (RS)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
GEORGE L. SCHILLING and SHU Y.
SCHILLING,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., d/b/a
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.; TRANS
UNION, LLC; EXPERIAN INFORMATION
SOLUTIONS INC.; and EQUIFAX INC.;
Defendants.
CASE NO. 2:17-cv-00060-RSM
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND
DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC
ONLY
15
16
Plaintiffs George L. Schilling and Shu Y. Schilling, by counsel, and Defendant Trans Union,
17
LLC (“Trans Union”), by counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that all matters herein between
18
them have been compromised and settled, and that Plaintiffs’ cause against Trans Union only
19
should be dismissed, with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.
20
Respectfully submitted,
21
22
Date: June 6, 2017
/s/ Vincent Omar Barraza (with consent)
23
Counsel for George L. Schilling and Shu Y.
Schilling
24
25
26
Date: June 7, 2017
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL - 1
(2:17-cv-00060-RSM)
/s/ Katherine E. Carlton Robinson
Katherine E. Carlton Robinson, Esq.
SCHUCKIT & ASSOCIATES, P.C.
4545 NORTHWESTERN DRIVE
ZIONSVILLE, IN 46077
(317) 363-2400 TEL
(317) 363-2257 FAX
(Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
1
2
Lead Counsel for Defendant Trans Union,
LLC
3
4
George W. Akers, P.S.
WA State Bar No. 00498
5
6
Local Counsel for Defendant Trans Union,
LLC
7
8
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 8th day of June, 2017.
11
12
13
14
A
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL - 2
(2:17-cv-00060-RSM)
SCHUCKIT & ASSOCIATES, P.C.
4545 NORTHWESTERN DRIVE
ZIONSVILLE, IN 46077
(317) 363-2400 TEL
(317) 363-2257 FAX
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?