Hooper et al v. City Of Seattle, Washington et al
Filing
216
ORDER granting 214 Stipulated Motion for Ten-Day Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiffs' Motion to Stay. Defendants' responses to Plaintiffs' Motion to Stay due 11/9/2017; Reply due 11/17/2017. Plaintiffs' 210 MOTION to Stay Proceedings Pending Appeal is re-noted for 11/17/2017. Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (PM)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
5
6
7
LISA HOOPER, et al.,
8
ORDER GRANTING TEN-DAY
EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND
TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO STAY
PROCEEDINGS PENDING APPEAL
Plaintiffs,
9
Case No. C17-77RSM
v.
10
CITY OF SEATTLE, et al.,
11
Defendants.
12
13
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ and Defendants’ Stipulated Motion for Ten-
14
Day Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Stay. (Dkt. #214). Plaintiffs filed
15
their Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Appeal (Dkt. #210) on October 19, 2017. Pursuant to
16
Local Civil Rule 7(d)(3), Plaintiffs noted this motion for consideration on November 3, 2017,
17
18
thus giving Defendants until October 30, 2017, to file their responses. Because Plaintiffs and
19
Defendants agree to extend Defendants’ response deadline by ten days, the Court hereby
20
ORDERS that Defendants’ responses to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Stay shall be filed by November 9,
21
2017. Plaintiffs may file a reply by November 17, 2017. The Clerk of the Court is instructed to
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
re-note Plaintiffs’ Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Appeal (Dkt. #210) to November 17,
2017.
DATED this 30 day of October, 2017.
A
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
ORDER GRANTING TEN-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME - 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?