Hooper et al v. City Of Seattle, Washington et al

Filing 216

ORDER granting 214 Stipulated Motion for Ten-Day Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiffs' Motion to Stay. Defendants' responses to Plaintiffs' Motion to Stay due 11/9/2017; Reply due 11/17/2017. Plaintiffs' 210 MOTION to Stay Proceedings Pending Appeal is re-noted for 11/17/2017. Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (PM)

Download PDF
  1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 5 6 7 LISA HOOPER, et al., 8 ORDER GRANTING TEN-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING APPEAL Plaintiffs, 9 Case No. C17-77RSM v. 10 CITY OF SEATTLE, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ and Defendants’ Stipulated Motion for Ten- 14 Day Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Stay. (Dkt. #214). Plaintiffs filed 15 their Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Appeal (Dkt. #210) on October 19, 2017. Pursuant to 16 Local Civil Rule 7(d)(3), Plaintiffs noted this motion for consideration on November 3, 2017, 17 18 thus giving Defendants until October 30, 2017, to file their responses. Because Plaintiffs and 19 Defendants agree to extend Defendants’ response deadline by ten days, the Court hereby 20 ORDERS that Defendants’ responses to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Stay shall be filed by November 9, 21 2017. Plaintiffs may file a reply by November 17, 2017. The Clerk of the Court is instructed to 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 re-note Plaintiffs’ Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Appeal (Dkt. #210) to November 17, 2017. DATED this 30 day of October, 2017. A RICARDO S. MARTINEZ CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ORDER GRANTING TEN-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME - 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?