Hill v. Value Inn 22246

Filing 3

ORDER by Hon. James P. Donohue granting Plaintiff's 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (PM) cc: Plaintiff via the U.S. Mail

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 7 Case No. C17-87-JLR ANTHONY D. HILL, 8 10 11 ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND RECOMMENDATION FOR REVIEW Plaintiff, 9 v. VALUE INN 22246, 12 Defendant. 13 14 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, has filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis 15 (“IFP”) in the above-entitled action. Dkt. 1. After careful consideration of the application, the 16 governing law and the balance of the record, the Court ORDERS as follows: 17 (1) Because plaintiff does not appear to have funds available to afford the $400.00 18 filing fee, he financially qualifies for IFP status pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). Therefore, 19 plaintiff’s IFP application, Dkt. 1, is GRANTED. However, the undersigned recommends 20 review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). 21 22 23 (2) The Clerk of the Court is directed to send a copy of this Order to plaintiff and to the Honorable James L. Robart. DATED this 27th day of January, 2017. A 24 25 JAMES P. DONOHUE Chief United States Magistrate Judge 26 ORDER PAGE - 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?