Williams v. Sampson et al

Filing 23

MINUTE ORDER granting Plaintiff Kirk Williams's 21 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendants' 10 Motion to Quash is renoted for 3/31/2017. Williams's response due 3/27/2017. Defendants' 11 Motion for Summary Judgment is renoted for 4/7/2017; Williams's response now due 4/3/2017. Defendant's 5 Motion to Dismiss is renoted for 4/7/2017 as well. Williams's 22 Motion to Compel is also pending. Defendants' response due 4/3/2017; Williams's reply due 4/7/2017. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. **2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Kirk Williams, Prisoner ID: 879031)(PM)

Download PDF
THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 9 KIRK WILLIAMS, 10 11 12 13 14 Plaintiff, CASE NO. C17-0092-JCC MINUTE ORDER v. CYNTHIA SAMPSON and SHORELINE POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendants. 15 16 17 18 The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable John C. Coughenour, United States District Judge: This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Kirk Williams’s motion to extend time 19 (Dkt. No. 21). Williams explains that his access to the prison law library has been restricted and 20 requests a two-week extension. (Id. at 1.) The Court interprets this as a request to extend the 21 deadlines to file the briefs responsive to Defendants’ motion to quash (Dkt. No. 10) and motion 22 for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 11). The motion for extension (Dkt. No. 21) is GRANTED. 23 Williams’s response to the motion to quash (Dkt. No. 10) was due on March 13, 2017. 24 With a two-week extension, Williams’s response is now due Monday, March 27, 2017. 25 Accordingly, the motion to quash (Dkt. No. 10) is RENOTED for Friday, March 31, 2017. 26 Williams’s response to the motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 11) is due Monday, MINUTE ORDER C17-0092-JCC PAGE - 1 1 March 20, 2017. With a two-week extension, Williams’s response is now due Monday, April 3, 2 2017. Accordingly, the motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 11) is RENOTED for 3 Friday, April 7, 2017. 4 Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 5) is fully briefed and no response from 5 Williams is due. (See Dkt. No. 15.) Thus, there shall be no extension as to that motion. However, 6 given the nature of the briefing, namely that Defendants’ reply brief was also in effect a motion 7 for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 11), those two motions shall be decided together. Accordingly, 8 the motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 5) is also RENOTED for Friday, April 7, 2017. 9 Also pending is Williams’s motion to compel (Dkt. No. 22). This motion must be 10 resolved before the Court can consider the motion for summary judgment, and both motions are 11 noted for the same day. Thus, there shall be no extension of time for Williams to file his reply 12 brief on that motion. Defendants’ response brief is due Monday, April 3, 2017. Williams’s reply 13 brief is due Friday, April 7, 2017. 14 No further extensions shall be granted absent extraordinary circumstances. 15 The Clerk is DIRECTED to send a copy of this order to Williams. 16 DATED this 20th day of March 2017. 17 William M. McCool Clerk of Court 18 s/Paula McNabb Deputy Clerk 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 MINUTE ORDER C17-0092-JCC PAGE - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?