Wagafe et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
Filing
183
ORDER re Defendants' 156 Emergency Motion to Stay pending appellate review. The Court understands this motion to be one for reconsideration of its April 11, 2018 Order denying in part Defendants' motion for a protective order. (Dkt. # 148 ). The Court GRANTS Defendants' motion for reconsideration. (Dkt. # 156 ). Signed by Judge Richard A. Jones. (TH)
Case 2:17-cv-00094-RAJ Document 183 Filed 05/10/18 Page 1 of 3
1
HONORABLE RICHARD A. JONES
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
8
9
10
ABDIQAFAR WAGAFE, et al.,
11
Plaintiffs,
12
ORDER
v.
13
CASE NO. C17-94 RAJ
DONALD TRUMP, President of the
United States, et al.,
14
15
Defendants.
16
17
This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ emergency motion for stay
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
pending appellate review. Dkt. # 156. Plaintiffs oppose the motion. Dkt. # 157. The
Court understands this motion to be one for reconsideration of its April 11, 2018 Order
denying in part Defendants’ motion for a protective order. Dkt. # 148; see also Dkt. #
156 at 8. On May 9, 2018, the Court held a telephonic hearing on the matter. For the
reasons that follow, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion for reconsideration. Dkt. #
156.
“Motions for reconsideration are disfavored.” LCR 7(h)(1). “The court will
ordinarily deny such motions in the absence of a showing of manifest error in the prior
27
ORDER- 1
Case 2:17-cv-00094-RAJ Document 183 Filed 05/10/18 Page 2 of 3
1 ruling or a showing of new facts or legal authority which could not have been brought to
2 its attention earlier with reasonable diligence.” Id.
3
On April 24, 2018, the Court gave Defendants the opportunity to file a sampling of
4 case-by-case determinations regarding individual national security threats as they appear
5 on the class list. Dkt. # 162. Defendants filed the sampling ex parte and the Court
6 reviewed in camera. Though the Court finds this to be a close call—Defendants could
7 have attempted this strategy earlier to present such information—the Court nonetheless
8 finds that Defendants’ motion for reconsideration has merit.
9
The Court reconsiders the portion of its prior Order, Dkt. # 148, that required
10 Defendants to produce case-by-case determinations to Plaintiffs’ attorneys under an
11 attorney eyes only provision. In reconsidering, the Court once more reviews the
12 underlying motion for protective order. Dkt. # 126. The Court finds that it is appropriate
13 to find in favor of Defendants. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion for
14 a limited protective order to produce the class list under an attorney eyes only provision.
15 Dkt. # 126.
16
The Court therefore ORDERS the parties to abide by the following limited
17 protective order:
18
Disclosure of, and access to, the names, Alien numbers (“A numbers”), and
19 application filing dates of the unnamed plaintiff members of the Naturalization Class and
20 Adjustment-of-Status Class shall be limited to the following:
21
22
23
(1) Plaintiffs’ attorneys of record, during such time as they continue to represent
Plaintiffs;
(2) Experts retained by Plaintiffs to the extent reasonably necessary to prepare expert
24
reports and testimony; and
25
(3) The Court and court personnel.
26
Plaintiffs’ attorneys of record shall maintain the above-described information in a
27 secure manner, i.e. in a locked filing cabinet (for any paper copy) or in a password-
ORDER- 2
Case 2:17-cv-00094-RAJ Document 183 Filed 05/10/18 Page 3 of 3
1 protected electronic file to which only authorized persons have access, and shall not
2 transmit that information over any electronic mail or cloud-based sharing unless the
3 method of transmission employs point-to-point encryption or other similar encrypted
4 transmission.
5
Plaintiffs’ counsel, and any person acting on their behalf, are prohibited from
6 either disclosing to any individual who contacts them whether that individual is an
7 unnamed member of either the Naturalization Class or Adjustment-of-Status class, or
8 contacting the unnamed plaintiff members of the Naturalization Class and Adjustment-of9 Status class for any purpose absent prior order of this Court.
10
Plaintiffs’ counsel must strictly abide by this limited protective order.
11
Defendants agree to meet and confer with Plaintiffs’ counsel over ways in which
12 Defendants might be able to provide Plaintiffs’ counsel with information about particular
13 unnamed class members to develop evidence for use in their case. Defendants agree to
14 do so while keeping in mind their obligation to protect against dangers to important
15 governmental interests.
16
Dated this 10th day of May, 2018.
17
A
18
19
The Honorable Richard A. Jones
United States District Judge
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
ORDER- 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?