Gallahan v. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
Filing
47
STIPULATION AND ORDER dismissing case with prejudice per parties' 46 Stipulation. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
8
9
KIMBERLY GALLAHAN,
10
Plaintiff,
11
v.
12
13
PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE
COMPANY,
14
No. 2:17-cv-00131-RSM
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
Defendant.
15
16
STIPULATION
17
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by plaintiff and defendant, through their respective
18
19
attorneys, that this cause, including all claims that were or could have been asserted by any party
20
may be dismissed with prejudice.
21
///
22
///
23
24
///
///
25
26
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 1
KELLER ROHRBACK
L.L.P.
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3200
Seattle, W A 98101-3052
TELEPHONE: (206) 623-1900
FACSIMILE: (206) 623-3384
DATED this 24th day of February, 2020.
1
2
ABEYTA NELSON P.C.
KELLER ROHRBACK L.L.P.
By
By
3
4
5
6
7
8
Terry Abeyta, WSBA # 7165
Abeyta Nelson P.C.
1102 W. Yakima Avenue
Yakima, WA 98902
Phone: 509-575-1588
Email: tabeyta@abeytanelson.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
Mirén C. First, WSBA #26202
David J. Russell, WSBA #17289
Keller Rohrback L.L.P.
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3200
Seattle, WA 98101
Phone: 206-623-1900;
Email: mfirst@kellerrohrback.com
Email: drussell@kellerrohrback.com
Attorneys for Defendant
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ORDER
Based upon the foregoing stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-titled
cause is hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs to any party.
DATED this 26th day of February 2020.
A
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 2
KELLER ROHRBACK
L.L.P.
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3200
Seattle, W A 98101-3052
TELEPHONE: (206) 623-1900
FACSIMILE: (206) 623-3384
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?