Gallahan v. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company

Filing 47

STIPULATION AND ORDER dismissing case with prejudice per parties' 46 Stipulation. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 KIMBERLY GALLAHAN, 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. 12 13 PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, 14 No. 2:17-cv-00131-RSM STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Defendant. 15 16 STIPULATION 17 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by plaintiff and defendant, through their respective 18 19 attorneys, that this cause, including all claims that were or could have been asserted by any party 20 may be dismissed with prejudice. 21 /// 22 /// 23 24 /// /// 25 26 STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 1 KELLER ROHRBACK L.L.P. 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3200 Seattle, W A 98101-3052 TELEPHONE: (206) 623-1900 FACSIMILE: (206) 623-3384 DATED this 24th day of February, 2020. 1 2 ABEYTA NELSON P.C. KELLER ROHRBACK L.L.P. By By 3 4 5 6 7 8 Terry Abeyta, WSBA # 7165 Abeyta Nelson P.C. 1102 W. Yakima Avenue Yakima, WA 98902 Phone: 509-575-1588 Email: tabeyta@abeytanelson.com Attorney for Plaintiff Mirén C. First, WSBA #26202 David J. Russell, WSBA #17289 Keller Rohrback L.L.P. 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3200 Seattle, WA 98101 Phone: 206-623-1900; Email: mfirst@kellerrohrback.com Email: drussell@kellerrohrback.com Attorneys for Defendant 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ORDER Based upon the foregoing stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-titled cause is hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs to any party. DATED this 26th day of February 2020. A RICARDO S. MARTINEZ CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 2 KELLER ROHRBACK L.L.P. 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3200 Seattle, W A 98101-3052 TELEPHONE: (206) 623-1900 FACSIMILE: (206) 623-3384

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?