Ali et al v. Trump et al
ORDER by Judge James L. Robart denying Plaintiffs' 31 Motion to synchronize briefing schedule. Parties ordered to proceed with briefing Plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and this court's Local Civil Rules. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65; Local Rules W.D. Wash. LCR 7(d)(3). (PM)
Case 2:17-cv-00135-JLR Document 34 Filed 02/14/17 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
JUWEIYA ABDIAZIZ ALI, et al.,
CASE NO. C17-0135JLR
ORDER REGARDING THE
BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR A
DONALD TRUMP, et al.,
Before the court is Plaintiffs’ motion seeking to synchronize the briefing schedule
on their motion for a preliminary injunction (PI Mot. (Dkt. # 9)) with the briefing
schedule on a motion for a preliminary injunction in Washington v. Trump, No.
C17-0141JLR (W.D. Wash.). (Mot. (Dkt. # 31).) On February 13, 2017, the court
entered an order in Washington v. Trump, indicating that because the Ninth Circuit Court
of Appeals had construed the court’s TRO as a preliminary injunction, the district court
would not entertain any further briefing on a motion for preliminary injunction in that
case. See Washington v. Trump, No. C17-0141JLR (W.D. Wash.), Dkt. ## 77 (Min.
ORDER - 1
Case 2:17-cv-00135-JLR Document 34 Filed 02/14/17 Page 2 of 2
Entry), 78 (2/14/17 Order). Accordingly, the court DENIES Plaintiffs’ motion (Dkt.
# 31) and ORDERS the parties to proceed with briefing Plaintiffs’ motion for a
preliminary injunction in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and this
court’s Local Civil Rules. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65; Local Rules W.D. Wash. LCR 7(d)(3)
(“Motions . . . seeking a preliminary injunction . . . shall be noted for consideration on a
date no earlier than the fourth Friday after filing and service of the motion.”).
Dated this 14th day of February, 2017.
JAMES L. ROBART
United States District Judge
ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?