Ali et al v. Trump et al

Filing 88

MINUTE ORDER granting Defendants a short-term extension of time for their responses to Plaintiffs' amended complaint 52 and second motion for class certification 58 through Wednesday, April 5, 2017. The court further schedules a telephone conference for 10:00 a.m., Pacific Daylight Time (PDT), on April 5, 2017, at which time the court will consider Defendants' motion to extend 86 the two deadlines at issue to ten (10) days after the court resolves Defendants' pending motion to stay 85 . Plaintiffs' response to Defendants' motion for an extension of time is due by 12:00 noon, PDT, on 4/4/2017. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 10 JUWEIYA ABDIAZIZ ALI, et al., Plaintiffs, 11 v. 12 13 ORDER SCHEDULING LOCAL RULE LCR 7(I) TELEPHONE CONFERENCE DONALD TRUMP, et al., Defendants. 14 15 CASE NO. C17-0135JLR Before the court is Defendants’ March 30, 2017, motion for an extension of time 16 to respond to Plaintiffs’ amended complaint (Am. Compl. (Dkt. # 52)) and second motion 17 for class certification (2d Class Cert. Mot. (Dkt. # 58)) until ten (10) days after the court 18 resolves Defendants’ pending motion to stay the entire proceeding. (See Mot. for Ext. 19 (Dkt. # 86); see also Mot. to Stay (Dkt. # 85).) In addition, on March 30, 2017, 20 Defendants requested that the court schedule a telephonic conference on March 31, 2017, 21 under Local Rule LCR 7(i), with respect to their motion for an extension of time. See 22 Local Rules W.D. Wash. LCR 7(i). The court is unavailable for a telephone conference ORDER - 1 1 until Wednesday, April 5, 2017. Accordingly, the court grants Defendants a short-term 2 extension of time for their responses to Plaintiffs’ amended complaint and second motion 3 for class certification through Wednesday, April 5, 2017. The court further schedules a 4 telephone conference for 10:00 a.m., Pacific Daylight Time (“PDT”), on April 5, 2017, at 5 which time the court will consider Defendants’ motion to extend the two deadlines at 6 issue to ten (10) days after the court resolves Defendants’ pending motion to stay. 7 Finally, the court directs Plaintiffs to file their response to Defendants’ motion for an 8 extension of time no later than 12:00 noon, PDT, on Tuesday, April 4, 2017. Defendants 9 shall not file a reply memorandum. See id. (“[W]hat procedural requirements will be 10 imposed, . . . are within the sole discretion of the court.”). The telephone conference 11 shall be conducted in the undersigned judge’s courtroom. Any counsel who prefers to 12 appear in person, rather than via telephone, is authorized (but not required) to do so. 13 Dated this 31st day of March, 2017. 14 15 A 16 JAMES L. ROBART United States District Judge 17 18 19 20 21 22 ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?