State of Washington, et al., v. Trump., et al
Filing
120
ORDER directing Defendants to file a response to Plaintiffs' 119 Emergency Motion to Enforce Preliminary Injunction. Response due no later than 4:30 p.m., Pacific Daylight Time, on March 14, 2017. The court will defer scheduling a hearing, if any, on Plaintiffs' emergency motion until after it has reviewed Defendants' response. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
8
9
10
STATE OF WASHINGTON, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
11
v.
12
13
DONALD J. TRUMP, et al.,
ORDER REGARDING
DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE TO
PLAINTIFFS’ EMERGENCY
MOTION TO ENFORCE THE
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
Defendants.
14
15
CASE NO. C17-0141JLR
The court is in receipt of Plaintiffs’ emergency motion to enforce the court’s
16
February 3, 2017, order preliminarily enjoining certain provisions of the January 27,
17
2017, Executive Order, entitled “Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into
18
the United States.” (Em. Mot. (Dkt. # 119); see also Order (Dkt. # 52).) Plaintiffs ask
19
the court to “order a response and set a hearing for March 14.” (Em. Mot. at 12.) The
20
court hereby ORDERS Defendants to file a response to Plaintiffs’ motion no later than
21
4:30 p.m., Pacific Daylight Time, on March 14, 2017. Defendants’ response shall be
22
limited to 13 pages, which is the length of Plaintiffs’ motion. (See generally id.) The
ORDER - 1
1
court will defer scheduling a hearing, if any, on Plaintiffs’ emergency motion until after it
2
has reviewed Defendants’ response. In any event, the court will not schedule a hearing
3
prior to March 15, 2017. If the court schedules a hearing on Plaintiffs’ emergency
4
motion, the court will permit the parties to appear by telephone.
5
Dated this 13th day of March, 2017.
6
7
A
8
JAMES L. ROBART
United States District Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?