State of Washington, et al., v. Trump., et al

Filing 120

ORDER directing Defendants to file a response to Plaintiffs' 119 Emergency Motion to Enforce Preliminary Injunction. Response due no later than 4:30 p.m., Pacific Daylight Time, on March 14, 2017. The court will defer scheduling a hearing, if any, on Plaintiffs' emergency motion until after it has reviewed Defendants' response. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 10 STATE OF WASHINGTON, et al., Plaintiffs, 11 v. 12 13 DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS’ EMERGENCY MOTION TO ENFORCE THE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Defendants. 14 15 CASE NO. C17-0141JLR The court is in receipt of Plaintiffs’ emergency motion to enforce the court’s 16 February 3, 2017, order preliminarily enjoining certain provisions of the January 27, 17 2017, Executive Order, entitled “Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into 18 the United States.” (Em. Mot. (Dkt. # 119); see also Order (Dkt. # 52).) Plaintiffs ask 19 the court to “order a response and set a hearing for March 14.” (Em. Mot. at 12.) The 20 court hereby ORDERS Defendants to file a response to Plaintiffs’ motion no later than 21 4:30 p.m., Pacific Daylight Time, on March 14, 2017. Defendants’ response shall be 22 limited to 13 pages, which is the length of Plaintiffs’ motion. (See generally id.) The ORDER - 1 1 court will defer scheduling a hearing, if any, on Plaintiffs’ emergency motion until after it 2 has reviewed Defendants’ response. In any event, the court will not schedule a hearing 3 prior to March 15, 2017. If the court schedules a hearing on Plaintiffs’ emergency 4 motion, the court will permit the parties to appear by telephone. 5 Dated this 13th day of March, 2017. 6 7 A 8 JAMES L. ROBART United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?