State of Washington, et al., v. Trump., et al
ORDER of USCA (17-35105) as to 53 Notice of Appeal, filed by U.S. Department of Homeland Security, John Kelly, United States of America, Tom Shannon, Donald J. Trump. The motions for leave to file amicus curiae briefs, to file a substitute or amended amicus curiae brief, and for an extension of time to file an amicus curiae brief, are granted. (SG)
Case: 17-35105, 02/09/2017, ID: 10310977, DktEntry: 135, Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
STATE OF WASHINGTON and STATE
FEB 09 2017
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
D.C. No. 2:17-cv-00141
Western District of Washington,
DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the
United States; et al.,
Before: CANBY, CLIFTON, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.
The motions for leave to file amicus curiae briefs, to file a substitute or
amended amicus curiae brief, and for an extension of time to file an amicus curiae
brief, are granted (Docket Entry Nos. 19, 20, 22, 24, 26, 43, 49, 53, 55, 58, 62, 65,
66, 68, 69, 76, 79, 82, 87, 90, 91, 103, 113, 132). In light of the filing of a
corrected amicus brief, the motions at Docket Entry Nos. 23 and 25 are denied as
David Golden’s motion to intervene is denied (Docket Entry No. 112).
Any motion for reconsideration or reconsideration en banc of the court’s
February 9, 2017 order denying the motion for stay is due within 14 days. See 9th
Case: 17-35105, 02/09/2017, ID: 10310977, DktEntry: 135, Page 2 of 2
Cir. R. 27-10(a)(2). If a motion for reconsideration or reconsideration en banc is
filed, a response to the motion shall be filed within 7 days after service of the
motion. See 9th Cir. R. 27-10(b).
The following briefing schedule shall govern this appeal: the opening brief
is due March 3, 2017; the answering brief is due March 24, 2017; and the optional
reply brief is due March 29, 2017.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?