State of Washington, et al., v. Trump., et al

Filing 73

ORDER of USCA (17-35105) as to 53 Notice of Appeal, filed by U.S. Department of Homeland Security, John Kelly, United States of America, Tom Shannon, Donald J. Trump. A judge on this Court has made a sua sponte request that a vote be taken as to whether the order issued by the three judge motions panel on February 9, 2017, should be reconsidered en banc. A sua sponte en banc call having been made, the parties are instructed to file simultaneous briefs setting forth their respective positions on whether this matter should be reconsidered en banc. The briefs should be filed on or before 11:00 a.m., Pacific time, on Thursday, February 16. The supplemental briefs shall be filed electronically and consist of no more than 14,000 words. See General Order 5.4(c)(3). (RE)

Download PDF
Case: 17-35105, 02/10/2017, ID: 10315878, DktEntry: 139, Page 1 of 1 FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT STATE OF WASHINGTON and STATE OF MINNESOTA, Plaintiffs-Appellees, No. FEB 10 2017 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS 17-35105 D.C. No. 2:17-cv-00141 Western District of Washington, Seattle v. DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States; et al., ORDER Defendants-Appellants. THOMAS, Chief Judge and En Banc Coordinator: A judge on this Court has made a sua sponte request that a vote be taken as to whether the order issued by the three judge motions panel on February 9, 2017, should be reconsidered en banc. A sua sponte en banc call having been made, the parties are instructed to file simultaneous briefs setting forth their respective positions on whether this matter should be reconsidered en banc. The briefs should be filed on or before 11:00 a.m., Pacific time, on Thursday, February 16. The supplemental briefs shall be filed electronically and consist of no more than 14,000 words. See General Order 5.4(c)(3).

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?