State of Washington, et al., v. Trump., et al
Filing
87
ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND JOINT STATUS REPORT by Judge James L. Robart. Joint Status Report due by 3/22/2017, FRCP 26f Conference Deadline is 3/1/2017, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 3/15/2017. (AD)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
5
6
7 STATE OF WASHINGTON, et al.,
Plaintiff(s),
8
Case No. 2:17−cv−00141−JLR
v.
9
DONALD J. TRUMP, et al.,
10
11
ORDER REGARDING INITIAL
DISCLOSURES, JOINT STATUS
REPORT, AND
EARLY SETTLEMENT
Defendant(s).
12
13
14
I. INITIAL SCHEDULING DATES
15
The Court sets the following dates for initial disclosure and submission of the
16
Joint Status Report and Discovery Plan:
17
Deadline for FRCP 26(f) Conference:
3/1/2017
18
Initial Disclosures Pursuant to FRCP 26(a)(1):
3/15/2017
19
Combined Joint Status Report and Discovery
Plan as Required by FRCP 26(f)
and Local Civil Rule 26(f):
3/22/2017
20
The deadlines above may be extended only by the Court. Any request for an
21
extension should be made by telephone to Ashleigh Drecktrah, Courtroom Deputy, at
22
(206) 370−8520. If Defendants have appeared, the parties are directed to meet and to
23
ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES, JOINT STATUS REPORT,
AND EARLY SETTLEMENT − 1
1
confer before contacting the Court to request an extension.
2
If this case involves claims which are exempt from the requirements of
3
4
FRCP 26(a) and 26(f), please notify Ashleigh Drecktrah, Courtroom Deputy, by
telephone at (206) 370−8520.
5
II. JOINT STATUS REPORT & DISCOVERY PLAN
6
All counsel and any pro se parties are directed to confer and provide the Court
7
with a combined Joint Status Report and Discovery Plan (the "Report") by
8
March 22, 2017. This conference shall be by direct and personal communication,
9
whether that be a face−to−face meeting or a telephonic conference. The Report will be
10
used in setting a schedule for the prompt completion of the case. It must contain the
11
following information by corresponding paragraph numbers:
13
1.
A statement of the nature and complexity of the case.
2.
A proposed deadline for the joining of additional parties.
3.
12
The parties have the right to consent to assignment of this case to a full time
14
United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(c) and Local Rule MJR 13
15
to conduct all proceedings. The Western District of Washington assigns a wide range of
16
cases to Magistrate Judges. The Magistrate Judges of this district thus have significant
17
18
19
experience in all types of civil matters filed in our court. Additional information about
our district's Magistrate Judges can be found at www.wawd.uscourts.gov. The
parties should indicate whether they agree that the Honorable Mary Alice Theiler
20
may conduct all proceedings including trial and the entry of judgment. When
21
responding to this question, the parties should only respond "yes" or "no". Individual
22
party responses should not be provided. A "yes" response should be indicated only
23
ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES, JOINT STATUS REPORT,
AND EARLY SETTLEMENT − 2
1
if parties consent. Otherwise, a "no" response should be provided.
2
4.
3
4
A discovery plan that states, by corresponding paragraph letters (A, B, etc.),
the parties' views and proposals on all items in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f)(3), which
includes the following topics:
5
(A) initial disclosures;
6
(B) subjects, timing, and potential phasing of discovery;
7
(C) electronically stored information;
8
(D) privilege issues;
9
(E) proposed limitations on discovery; and
(F) the need for any discovery related orders.
10
11
12
13
5.
The parties' views, proposals, and agreements, by corresponding paragraph
letters (A, B, etc.), on all items set forth in Local Civil Rule 26(f)(1), which includes
the following topics:
(A) prompt case resolution;
14
(B) alternative dispute resolution;
15
(C) related cases;
16
(D) discovery management;
17
18
19
(E) anticipated discovery sought;
(F) phasing motions;
(G) preservation of discoverable information;
20
(H) privilege issues;
21
(I) Model Protocol for Discovery of ESI; and;
22
(J) alternatives to Model Protocol.
23
ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES, JOINT STATUS REPORT,
AND EARLY SETTLEMENT − 3
1
6.
The date by which discovery can be completed.
7.
Whether the case should be bifurcated by trying the liability issues before
2
3
4
the damages issues, or bifurcated in any other way.
8.
Whether the pretrial statements and pretrial order called for by Local Civil
5
Rules 16(e), (h), (i), and k, and 16.1 should be dispensed with in whole or in part
6
for the sake of economy.
7
9.
Whether the parties intend to utilize the Individualized Trial Program set
8
forth in Local Civil Rule 39.2 or any ADR options set forth in Local Civil
9
Rule 39.1.
10
10. Any other suggestions for shortening or simplifying the case.
11
11. The date the case will be ready for trial. The Court expects that most civil
12
13
cases will be ready for trial within a year after filing the Joint Status Report and
Discovery Plan.
12. Whether the trial will be jury or non−jury.
14
13. The number of trial days required.
15
14. The names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all trial counsel.
16
15. The dates on which the trial counsel may have complications to be
17
18
19
considered in setting a trial date.
16. If, on the due date of the Report, all defendant(s) or respondents(s) have not
been served, counsel for the plaintiff shall advise the Court when service will be
20
effected, why it was not made earlier, and shall provide a proposed schedule for the
21
required FRCP 26(f) conference and FRCP 26(a) initial disclosures.
22
23
17. Whether any party wishes a scheduling conference before the Court enters
ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES, JOINT STATUS REPORT,
AND EARLY SETTLEMENT − 4
1
a scheduling order in the case.
2
18. List the date(s) that each and every nongovernmental corporate party filed
3
4
its disclosure statement pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 and Local Rule 7.1.
If the parties are unable to agree to any part of the Report, they may answer in
5
separate paragraphs. No separate reports are to be filed. If the parties wish to have a
6
status conference with the Court at any time during the pendency of this action, they
7
should notify Ashleigh Drecktrah by telephone at (206) 370−8520.
8
III. PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSIBILITY
9
This Order is issued at the outset of the case, and a copy is sent by the clerk to
10
counsel for plaintiff (or plaintiff, if pro se) and any defendants who have appeared.
11
12
Plaintiff's counsel (or plaintiff, if pro se) is directed to serve copies of this Order on all
parties who appear after this Order is filed. Such service shall be accomplished
13
within ten (10) days after each appearance. Plaintiff's counsel (or plaintiff, if pro se)
14
will be responsible for starting the communications needed to comply with this Order.
15
IV. JUDGE SPECIFIC PROCEDURAL INFORMATION
16
All counsel and unrepresented parties should review Judge Robart's web page
17
for procedural information applicable to cases before Judge Robart. The judges'
18
web pages, in addition to the Local Rules, Electronic Filing Procedures for Civil and
19
20
Criminal Cases, court forms, instruction sheets, and General Orders, can be found on
the Court's website at www.wawd.uscourts.gov.
21
22
23
ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES, JOINT STATUS REPORT,
AND EARLY SETTLEMENT − 5
1
V. EARLY SETTLEMENT CONSIDERATION AND NOTIFICATION
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
If settlement is achieved, counsel shall immediately notify Ashleigh Drecktrah,
Courtroom Deputy, at (206) 370−8520.
The parties are responsible for complying with the terms of this Order. The Court
may impose sanctions on any party who fails to comply fully with this Order.
DATED: The 15th of February 2017.
s/ James L. Robart
James L. Robart
United States District Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES, JOINT STATUS REPORT,
AND EARLY SETTLEMENT − 6
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?