Schlepp v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA et al

Filing 11

ORDER granting JPMorgan Chase Bank's 8 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Judge Ricardo S Martinez.(RS) Modified on 5/8/2017/cc W Schlepp (RS).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ) WESLEY SCHLEPP, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., et al., ) ) Defendants. ) Case No. C17-0152 RSM ORDER GRANTING JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.’S MOTION TO DISMISS ALL CLAIMS THIS MATTER came before the Court on Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.’s 14 (“Chase”) Motion to Dismiss. Dkt. #8. Plaintiff has failed to respond to the motion. Such 15 16 failure is deemed to be an admission that the motion has merit. Local Civil Rule 7(b)(2). 17 While Plaintiff’s failure to timely respond to the motion is a sufficient basis to dismiss 18 Plaintiff’s claims against Chase, the Court, having considered the papers submitted in support 19 of Chase’s motion, also finds that the motion should be GRANTED on the merits for the 20 reasons stated by Chase. See Dkt. #8 and Exs. 1-13 thereto. The Court further agrees that 21 22 23 24 amendment to the Complaint would be futile as to Chase. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Chase’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #8) is GRANTED, and all of Plaintiff’s claims against Chase are DISMISSED. 25 26 27 28 ORDER PAGE - 1 1 DATED this 8th day of May, 2017. A 2 3 RICARDO S. MARTINEZ CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER PAGE - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?