Schlepp v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA et al

Filing 11

ORDER granting JPMorgan Chase Bank's 8 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Judge Ricardo S Martinez.(RS) Modified on 5/8/2017/cc W Schlepp (RS).

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

)
WESLEY SCHLEPP,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., et al., )
)
Defendants.
)

Case No. C17-0152 RSM
ORDER GRANTING JPMORGAN
CHASE BANK, N.A.’S MOTION TO
DISMISS ALL CLAIMS

THIS MATTER came before the Court on Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.’s

14

(“Chase”) Motion to Dismiss. Dkt. #8. Plaintiff has failed to respond to the motion. Such
15
16

failure is deemed to be an admission that the motion has merit. Local Civil Rule 7(b)(2).

17

While Plaintiff’s failure to timely respond to the motion is a sufficient basis to dismiss

18

Plaintiff’s claims against Chase, the Court, having considered the papers submitted in support

19

of Chase’s motion, also finds that the motion should be GRANTED on the merits for the

20

reasons stated by Chase. See Dkt. #8 and Exs. 1-13 thereto. The Court further agrees that
21
22
23
24

amendment to the Complaint would be futile as to Chase.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Chase’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #8) is
GRANTED, and all of Plaintiff’s claims against Chase are DISMISSED.

25
26
27
28

ORDER
PAGE - 1

1

DATED this 8th day of May, 2017.

A

2
3

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

ORDER
PAGE - 2