Coachman v. Seattle Auto Management, Inc. et al
Filing
12
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER granting 10 Stipulated MOTION signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (PM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
7
8
TROY COACHMAN
9
10
11
12
Plaintiff,
15
16
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
v.
SEATTLE AUTO MANAGEMENT INC. dba
MERCEDES BENZ OF SEATTLE and AL
MONJAZEB
13
14
NO. C17-187 RSM
Defendants.
1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS
Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or
17
private information for which special protection may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby
18
stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties
19
acknowledge that this agreement is consistent with LCR 26(c). It does not confer blanket protection
20
21
on all disclosures or responses to discovery, the protection it affords from public disclosure and use
extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the
22
23
24
applicable legal principles, and it does not presumptively entitle parties to file confidential
information under seal.
25
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER - 1
6206001.1
Williams, Kastner & Gibbs PLLC
601 Union Street, Suite 4100
Seattle, Washington 98101-2380
(206) 628-6600
1
2
3
4
2. “CONFIDENTIAL” MATERIAL
“Confidential” material shall include the following documents and tangible things
produced or otherwise exchanged: any individual’s personnel records, financial records or
medical records, and Defendants’ financial information, employee information, customer and
5
6
7
8
client information, and any other proprietary information from which a business advantage is
gained by maintaining its confidentiality.
3. SCOPE
9
The protections conferred by this agreement cover not only confidential material (as
10
defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from confidential material; (2)
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of confidential material; and (3) any testimony,
conversations, or presentations by parties or their counsel that might reveal confidential material.
However, the protections conferred by this agreement do not cover information that is in
the public domain or becomes part of the public domain through trial or otherwise.
4. ACCESS TO AND USE OF CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL
4.1
Basic Principles. A receiving party may use confidential material that is disclosed
or produced by another party or by a non-party in connection with this case only for prosecuting,
defending, or attempting to settle this litigation. Confidential material may be disclosed only to
the categories of persons and under the conditions described in this agreement. Confidential
material must be stored and maintained by a receiving party at a location and in a secure manner
that ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized under this agreement.
24
25
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER - 2
6206001.1
Williams, Kastner & Gibbs PLLC
601 Union Street, Suite 4100
Seattle, Washington 98101-2380
(206) 628-6600
4.2
1
2
3
Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items.
Unless otherwise
ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the designating party, a receiving party may
disclose any confidential material only to:
4
(a)
the receiving party’s counsel of record in this action, as well as employees
5
6
of counsel to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this litigation;
(b)
7
the officers, directors, and employees (including in house counsel) of the
8
receiving party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation, unless the parties
9
agree that a particular document or material produced is for Attorney’s Eyes Only and is so
10
designated;
11
12
13
14
(c)
experts and consultants to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for
this litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit
A);
15
(d)
the court, court personnel, and court reporters and their staff;
16
(e)
copy or imaging services retained by counsel to assist in the duplication
17
of confidential material, provided that counsel for the party retaining the copy or imaging service
18
instructs the service not to disclose any confidential material to third parties and to immediately
19
return all originals and copies of any confidential material;
20
(f)
21
22
during their depositions, witnesses in the action to whom disclosure is
reasonably necessary and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound”
23
(Exhibit A), unless otherwise agreed by the designating party or ordered by the court. Pages of
24
transcribed deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that reveal confidential material must
25
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER - 3
6206001.1
Williams, Kastner & Gibbs PLLC
601 Union Street, Suite 4100
Seattle, Washington 98101-2380
(206) 628-6600
1
be separately bound by the court reporter and may not be disclosed to anyone except as permitted
2
under this agreement;
3
4
(g)
the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a
custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information.
5
4.3
6
7
Filing Confidential Material. Before filing confidential material or discussing or
referencing such material in court filings, the filing party shall confer with the designating party
8
to determine whether the designating party will remove the confidential designation, whether the
9
document can be redacted, or whether a motion to seal or stipulation and proposed order is
10
warranted. Local Civil Rule 5(g) sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the
11
12
13
14
15
standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under
seal.
5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL
5.1
Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each party
16
or non-party that designates information or items for protection under this agreement must take
17
care to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate
18
standards. The designating party must designate for protection only those parts of material,
19
20
21
22
documents, items, or oral or written communications that qualify, so that other portions of the
material, documents, items, or communications for which protection is not warranted are not
swept unjustifiably within the ambit of this agreement.
23
Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations that are
24
shown to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper purpose (e.g., to
25
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER - 4
6206001.1
Williams, Kastner & Gibbs PLLC
601 Union Street, Suite 4100
Seattle, Washington 98101-2380
(206) 628-6600
1
unnecessarily encumber or delay the case development process or to impose unnecessary
2
expenses and burdens on other parties) expose the designating party to sanctions.
3
4
If it comes to a designating party’s attention that information or items that it designated for
protection do not qualify for protection, the designating party must promptly notify all other
5
6
7
parties that it is withdrawing the mistaken designation.
5.2
Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in this
8
agreement (see, e.g., second paragraph of section 5.2(a) below), or as otherwise stipulated or
9
ordered, disclosure or discovery material that qualifies for protection under this agreement must
10
be clearly so designated when the material is disclosed or produced.
11
12
13
14
(a)
Information in documentary form: (e.g., paper or electronic documents
and deposition exhibits, but excluding transcripts of depositions or other pretrial or trial
proceedings), the designating party must affix the word “CONFIDENTIAL” to each page that
15
contains confidential material. If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies
16
for protection, the producing party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by
17
making appropriate markings in the margins).
18
19
20
21
22
(b)
Testimony given in deposition or in other pretrial proceedings: the parties
and any participating non-parties must identify on the record, during the deposition or other
pretrial proceeding, all protected testimony, without prejudice to their right to so designate other
testimony after reviewing the transcript. Any party or non-party may, within fifteen days after
23
receiving the transcript of the deposition or other pretrial proceeding, designate portions of the
24
transcript, or exhibits thereto, as confidential. If a party or non-party desires to protect confidential
25
information at trial, the issue should be addressed during the pre-trial conference.
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER - 5
6206001.1
Williams, Kastner & Gibbs PLLC
601 Union Street, Suite 4100
Seattle, Washington 98101-2380
(206) 628-6600
(c)
1
2
3
4
Other tangible items: the producing party must affix in a prominent place
on the exterior of the container or containers in which the information or item is stored the word
“CONFIDENTIAL.” If only a portion or portions of the information or item warrant protection,
the producing party, to the extent practicable, shall identify the protected portion(s).
5
6
7
5.3
Inadvertent Failures to Designate. If timely corrected, an inadvertent failure to
designate qualified information or items does not, standing alone, waive the designating party’s
8
right to secure protection under this agreement for such material. Upon timely correction of a
9
designation, the receiving party must make reasonable efforts to ensure that the material is treated
10
11
12
13
14
in accordance with the provisions of this agreement.
6. CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS
6.1
Timing of Challenges. Any party or non-party may challenge a designation of
confidentiality at any time. Unless a prompt challenge to a designating party’s confidentiality
15
designation is necessary to avoid foreseeable, substantial unfairness, unnecessary economic
16
burdens, or a significant disruption or delay of the litigation, a party does not waive its right to
17
challenge a confidentiality designation by electing not to mount a challenge promptly after the
18
original designation is disclosed.
19
20
21
22
6.2
Meet and Confer. The parties must make every attempt to resolve any dispute
regarding confidential designations without court involvement. Any motion regarding
confidential designations or for a protective order must include a certification, in the motion or
23
in a declaration or affidavit, that the movant has engaged in a good faith meet and confer
24
conference with other affected parties in an effort to resolve the dispute without court action.
25
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER - 6
6206001.1
Williams, Kastner & Gibbs PLLC
601 Union Street, Suite 4100
Seattle, Washington 98101-2380
(206) 628-6600
1
The certification must list the date, manner, and participants to the conference. A good faith
2
effort to confer requires a face-to-face meeting or a telephone conference.
3
4
6.3
Judicial Intervention. If the parties cannot resolve a challenge without court
intervention, the designating party may file and serve a motion to retain confidentiality under
5
6
7
Local Civil Rule 7 (and in compliance with Local Civil Rule 5(g), if applicable). The burden of
persuasion in any such motion shall be on the designating party. Frivolous challenges, and those
8
made for an improper purpose (e.g., to harass or impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on
9
other parties) may expose the challenging party to sanctions. All parties shall continue to
10
11
maintain the material in question as confidential until the court rules on the challenge.
12
PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED IN OTHER
LITIGATION
13
If a party is served with a subpoena or a court order issued in other litigation that compels
14
disclosure of any information or items designated in this action as “CONFIDENTIAL,” that
15
7.
party must:
16
(a)
17
18
promptly notify the designating party in writing and include a copy of the
subpoena or court order;
(b)
19
promptly notify in writing the party who caused the subpoena or order to
20
issue in the other litigation that some or all of the material covered by the subpoena or order is
21
subject to this agreement. Such notification shall include a copy of this agreement; and
22
23
(c)
cooperate with respect to all reasonable procedures sought to be pursued
by the designating party whose confidential material may be affected.
24
25
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER - 7
6206001.1
Williams, Kastner & Gibbs PLLC
601 Union Street, Suite 4100
Seattle, Washington 98101-2380
(206) 628-6600
8. UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL
1
2
3
4
If a receiving party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed confidential
material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this agreement, the receiving
party must immediately (a) notify in writing the designating party of the unauthorized
5
6
7
disclosures, (b) use its best efforts to retrieve all unauthorized copies of the protected material,
(c) inform the person or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were made of all the terms
8
of this agreement, and (d) request that such person or persons execute the “Acknowledgment and
9
Agreement to Be Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
10
11
9. INADVERTENT PRODUCTION OF PRIVILEGED OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED
MATERIAL
12
When a producing party gives notice to receiving parties that certain inadvertently
13
produced material is subject to a claim of privilege or other protection, the obligations of the
14
receiving parties are those set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(B). This
15
16
17
18
19
provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery
order or agreement that provides for production without prior privilege review. The parties agree
to the entry of a non-waiver order under Fed. R. Evid. 502(d) as set forth herein.
10.
NON TERMINATION AND RETURN OF DOCUMENTS
20
Within 60 days after the termination of this action, including all appeals, each receiving
21
party must return all confidential material to the producing party, including all copies, extracts
22
23
and summaries thereof. Alternatively, the parties may agree upon appropriate methods of
destruction.
24
25
Notwithstanding this provision, counsel are entitled to retain one archival copy of all
documents filed with the court, trial, deposition, and hearing transcripts, correspondence,
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER - 8
6206001.1
Williams, Kastner & Gibbs PLLC
601 Union Street, Suite 4100
Seattle, Washington 98101-2380
(206) 628-6600
1
deposition and trial exhibits, expert reports, attorney work product, and consultant and expert
2
work product, even if such materials contain confidential material.
3
4
The confidentiality obligations imposed by this agreement shall remain in effect until a
designating party agrees otherwise in writing or a court orders otherwise.
5
6
IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
7
DATED this 3rd day of October, 2017
DATED this 3rd day of October, 2017
8
s/ Beth Barrett Bloom
Beth Barrett Bloom, WSBA #31702
s/ Sean Phelan
Sean Phelan, WSBA #27866
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
FRANK FREED SUBIT & THOMAS LLP
705 Second Avenue, Suite 1200
Seattle, WA 98104
Telephone: (206) 682-6711
Fax: (206) 682-0401
sphelan@frankfreed.com
bbloom@frankfreed.com
s/ Sheryl J. Willert
Sheryl J. Willert, WSBA #08617
s/ Jeffery M. Wells
Jeffery M. Wells, WSBA #45840
Attorneys for Defendants
WILLIAMS, KASTNER & GIBBS PLLC
601 Union Street, Suite 4100
Seattle, WA 98101-2380
Telephone: (206) 628-6600
Fax: (206) 628-6611
swillert@williamskastner.com
jwells@williamskastner.com
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED
17
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 502(d), the production of any
18
documents in this proceeding shall not, for the purposes of this proceeding or any other proceeding
19
in any other court, constitute a waiver by the producing party of any privilege applicable to those
20
documents, including the attorney-client privilege, attorney work-product protection, or any other
21
privilege or protection recognized by law.
22
DATED this 5th day of October 2017.
23
A
24
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
25
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER - 9
6206001.1
Williams, Kastner & Gibbs PLLC
601 Union Street, Suite 4100
Seattle, Washington 98101-2380
(206) 628-6600
1
EXHIBIT A
2
ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND
3
4
5
I,
____________________________________
[print
or
type
full
name],
of
_________________________________________ [print or type full address], declare under
6
penalty of perjury that I have read in its entirety and understand the Stipulated Protective Order that
7
was issued by the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington on
8
_________________ [date] in the case of Troy Coachman v. Seattle Auto Management Inc. d/b/a
9
10
Mercedes Benz of Seattle and Al Monjazeb, Case No. 2:17-cv-00187 RSM. I agree to comply with
and to be bound by all the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order and I understand and
11
12
13
acknowledge that failure to so comply could expose me to sanctions and punishment in the nature
of contempt. I solemnly promise that I will not disclose in any manner any information or item that
14
is subject to this Stipulated Protective Order to any person or entity except in strict compliance with
15
the provisions of this Order.
16
17
18
19
I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the
Western District of Washington for the purpose of enforcing the terms of this Stipulated Protective
Order, even if such enforcement proceedings occur after termination of this action.
20
Date: ________________________
21
City and State where sworn and signed: ___________________________
22
Printed name:__________________
23
Signature: ___________________
24
25
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER - 10
6206001.1
Williams, Kastner & Gibbs PLLC
601 Union Street, Suite 4100
Seattle, Washington 98101-2380
(206) 628-6600
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?