Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC v. Clouse
Filing
14
ORDER denying plaintiff's 3 Motion for TRO by Judge Richard A Jones.(RS)
HONORABLE RICHARD A. JONES
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
7
8
9
MORGAN STANLEY SMITH
BARNEY, LLC,
10
11
12
Plaintiff,
Case No. C17-203-RAJ
ORDER
v.
KEVIN M. CLOUSE,
13
Defendant.
14
15
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Morgan Stanley Smith Barney,
16
LLC’s (“Morgan Stanley”) Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”). Dkt. # 3.
17
For the reasons that follow, the Court DENIES Morgan Stanley’s motion.
18
A TRO is “extraordinary remedy that may only be awarded upon a clear showing
19
that the plaintiff is entitled to such relief.” Winter v. Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc., 555
20
U.S. 7, 22 (2008).1 To obtain a TRO, Morgan Stanley must show that (1) it is likely to
21
succeed on the merits, (2) it is likely to suffer irreparable harm in the absence of
22
preliminary relief, (3) the balance of equities tips in its favor, and (4) an injunction is in
23
the public interest. Stormans, Inc. v. Selecky, 586 F.3d 1109, 1127 (9th Cir. 2009).
24
25
26
27
28
Having reviewed the motion, the complaint, the submissions of the parties, the
relevant portions of the record, and the applicable, law, the Court concludes that Morgan
1
The standard for issuing a TRO is identical to the standard for issuing a preliminary
injunction. New Motor Vehicle Bd. of California v. Orrin W. Fox Co., 434 U.S. 1345, 1347
(1977).
ORDER – 1
1
2
3
4
Stanley has not carried its burden to establish these elements. In particular, Morgan
Stanley has not established a likelihood of success on the merits, irreparable harm in the
absence of a TRO, or that the balance of equities tips in its favor. Accordingly, the Court
DENIES Morgan Stanley’s Motion for TRO. Dkt. # 3.
5
6
DATED this 10th day of February, 2017.
A
7
8
The Honorable Richard A. Jones
United States District Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER – 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?