Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC v. Clouse

Filing 14

ORDER denying plaintiff's 3 Motion for TRO by Judge Richard A Jones.(RS)

Download PDF
HONORABLE RICHARD A. JONES 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 9 MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY, LLC, 10 11 12 Plaintiff, Case No. C17-203-RAJ ORDER v. KEVIN M. CLOUSE, 13 Defendant. 14 15 This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, 16 LLC’s (“Morgan Stanley”) Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”). Dkt. # 3. 17 For the reasons that follow, the Court DENIES Morgan Stanley’s motion. 18 A TRO is “extraordinary remedy that may only be awarded upon a clear showing 19 that the plaintiff is entitled to such relief.” Winter v. Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc., 555 20 U.S. 7, 22 (2008).1 To obtain a TRO, Morgan Stanley must show that (1) it is likely to 21 succeed on the merits, (2) it is likely to suffer irreparable harm in the absence of 22 preliminary relief, (3) the balance of equities tips in its favor, and (4) an injunction is in 23 the public interest. Stormans, Inc. v. Selecky, 586 F.3d 1109, 1127 (9th Cir. 2009). 24 25 26 27 28 Having reviewed the motion, the complaint, the submissions of the parties, the relevant portions of the record, and the applicable, law, the Court concludes that Morgan 1 The standard for issuing a TRO is identical to the standard for issuing a preliminary injunction. New Motor Vehicle Bd. of California v. Orrin W. Fox Co., 434 U.S. 1345, 1347 (1977). ORDER – 1 1 2 3 4 Stanley has not carried its burden to establish these elements. In particular, Morgan Stanley has not established a likelihood of success on the merits, irreparable harm in the absence of a TRO, or that the balance of equities tips in its favor. Accordingly, the Court DENIES Morgan Stanley’s Motion for TRO. Dkt. # 3. 5 6 DATED this 10th day of February, 2017. A 7 8 The Honorable Richard A. Jones United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER – 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?