McNiven v. Trump
Filing
6
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and for improper service ; denying Plaintiff's 5 MOTION for Extension of Time ; Show Cause Response due no later than ten (10) days, by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (SWT) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
7
8
9
10
TIMOTHY S. MCNIVEN,
Plaintiff,
11
12
13
14
15
16
v.
Case No. C17-223RSM
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
RELIEF FROM DEADLINE AND ORDER
TO SHOW CAUSE
DONALD J. TRUMP,
Defendant.
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Timothy S. McNiven’s Motion for
Extension on the Lawsuit, which the Court interprets as a motion for relief from the upcoming
17
18
joint status report, Rule 26(f) conference, and initial disclosure deadlines. Dkt. #5; see also
19
LCR 7(j) (local rule setting forth procedure for moving for relief from a deadline). These
20
deadlines all occur in June of 2017. Dkt. #4. No action has been taken by Plaintiff in this case
21
after filing his Complaint, and Defendant has not made an appearance. Plaintiff now moves the
22
23
Court for relief from the above deadlines because he “had a Tooth break off under the gum-
24
line,” he has surgery scheduled for July 20, 2017, and he would “like to have at least a month
25
off for my mouth to heal since I have to talk for myself in this pro se case.” Dkt. #5.
26
27
The Court finds that Plaintiff has presented insufficient evidence to justify his requested
relief from deadlines. The upcoming deadlines occur prior to Plaintiff’s scheduled surgery and
28
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM DEADLINE AND ORDER TO SHOW
CAUSE - 1
1
Plaintiff has presented no evidence that he cannot meet these deadlines in his current condition.
2
Furthermore, there are no other upcoming events in this matter, such as oral argument, that
3
require Plaintiff to speak before the Court. The Court will thus deny Plaintiff’s Motion.
4
Plaintiff does not appear to be prosecuting his case given Defendant’s failure to answer
5
6
or otherwise respond. Furthermore, the Court is concerned that Plaintiff has failed to properly
7
serve Defendant President Donald J. Trump as required under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
8
4(i). Accordingly, the Court now issues an Order to Show Cause why this case should not be
9
dismissed for failure to prosecute and for improper service. In Response to this Order, Plaintiff
10
must write a short statement telling the Court: (1) if he intends to proceed with his claims; (2)
11
12
13
14
15
16
the reason for his failure to take any action in this matter since filing and serving his
Complaint; (3) why his method of service was proper.
After considering Plaintiff’s Motion and the remainder of the record, the Court hereby
finds and ORDERS:
(1) Plaintiff Timothy S. McNiven’s Motion for Extension on the Lawsuit (Dkt. #5) is
17
18
DENIED.
19
(2) Plaintiff shall file a Response to this Order to Show Cause containing the detail
20
described above no later than ten (10) days from the date of this Order. This
21
Response is not to exceed five (5) pages. Failure to respond could result in
22
23
24
25
26
27
dismissal of this case.
DATED this 30 day of May, 2017.
A
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
28
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM DEADLINE AND ORDER TO SHOW
CAUSE - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?