Tiwari et al v. Mattis
MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendant's 123 Motion for Protective Order; staying discovery pending resolution of cross-motions for summary judgment; granting in part and striking as moot in part Plaintiffs' 130 Motion to Compel Discovery; RENOTING Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment, dkts 115 , 132 : Noting Date 7/6/2018. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly.(SWT)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
KIRTI TIWARI, et al.,
JAMES MATTIS, Secretary, U.S.
Department of Defense, in his official
The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable
Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge:
Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Protective Order, docket no.
123 (the “Motion for Protective Order”) and Plaintiffs’ First Motion to Compel
Discovery, docket no. 130 (the “Motion to Compel”). The Motion for Protective Order is
GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Except as specified in Paragraph (2) of this
Minute Order, all discovery is STAYED pending resolution of the cross-motions for
summary judgment. See docket nos. 115 and 132 (the “Cross-Motions for Summary
The Motion to Compel is GRANTED in part and STRICKEN as moot in
19 part. Insofar as he has not done so already, Defendant is DIRECTED to fully answer
Plaintiffs’ First Interrogatory contained in Plaintiffs’ First Discovery Requests to
20 Defendant, docket no. 130-1 at 4, no later than Monday, June 8, 2018. That interrogatory
states as follows:
Please identify all rules, policies and procedures that apply to U.S. citizen
MAVNI soldiers as a group in the areas of counterintelligence and security
MINUTE ORDER - 1
screening and monitoring, issuance of security clearances, commissioning,
reenlistment, promotion, issuance of orders, and travel that are different
than the rules, policies and procedures that apply to other U.S. citizen
soldiers (including natural-born U.S. citizen soldiers).
Id. If no additional responsive information exists, Defendant is DIRECTED to confirm
4 such in his answer to the interrogatory. The Court understands that Defendant has
already produced the “RAND Report,” and Plaintiffs’ request to compel production of
5 that document is therefore moot.
Plaintiffs may file one supplemental brief in response to the CrossMotions for Summary Judgment, not to exceed ten (10) pages, on or before Friday,
7 June 22, 2018. Defendant may file one supplemental response, not to exceed ten (10)
pages, no later than Friday, June 29, 2018. The Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment
8 are RENOTED to Friday, July 6, 2018.
The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Minute Order to all counsel of
Dated this 25th day of May, 2018.
William M. McCool
MINUTE ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?