LHF Productions Inc v. Doe 1 et al
Filing
16
ORDER denying plaintiff's 15 Motion for Reconsideration signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez.(RS)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
8
9
10
LHF PRODUCTIONS, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
11
12
13
Case No. C17-254 RSM
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
DOE 1, et al.,
Defendants.
14
15
16
On May 19, 2017, the Court granted in part and denied in part Plaintiff LHF Productions,
17
Inc.’s (“LHF”) motion for extension of time to serve its Amended Complaint. Dkt. #14. In its
18
Order, the Court granted LHF a 30-day extension. Id. at 4. LHF, unsatisfied with the amount of
19
20
21
time the Court granted, asks the Court to reconsider its Order. See Dkt. #14 at 1-4. The Court
remains unpersuaded by LHF.
22
As stated in Local Civil Rule 7(h)(1), “[m]otions for reconsideration are disfavored.”
23
Consequently, the Court will “ordinarily deny such motions in the absence of a showing of
24
25
26
manifest error in the prior ruling or a showing of new facts or legal authority which could not have
been brought to [the Court’s] attention earlier with reasonable diligence.” LCR 7(h)(1). LHF fails
27
to address this standard. Instead of showing a manifest error in the Court’s Order, or directing the
28
Court to new facts or legal authority which could not have been brought to the Court’s attention
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION — 1
1
earlier, LHF simply concludes the Court “overlooked or misapprehended certain important
2
matters,” then outlines five reasons explaining why it disagrees with the Court’s Order. Dkt. #14
3
at 1-4. LHF’s motion, aside from failing to meet the LCR 7(h)(1) standard, fails to persuade the
4
Court. LHF’s motion for reconsideration (Dkt. #15) is accordingly DENIED.
5
6
Dated this 16th day of June 2017.
7
8
A
9
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION — 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?