Blair v. City of Mercer Island
Filing
51
ORDER granting Defendant's 42 Motion to Continue the trial date; and granting Defendant's 44 Motion for Extension of Time to file dispositive motions. Jury Trial is set for 8/20/2018 at 9:30 AM before U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. Dispositive motions due by 4/27/2018, Motions in Limine due by 7/12/2018, Pretrial Order due by 8/10/2018, Trial briefs to be submitted by 8/13/2018, Proposed voir dire/jury instructions due by 8/13/2018. The Clerk is DIRECTED to re-note Defendant's motions in limine (Dkt. No. 35 ) to July 27, 2018. Signed by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH)
THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
7
8
9
JAMES M. BLAIR,
10
Plaintiff,
ORDER
v.
11
12
CASE NO. C17-0265-JCC
CITY OF MERCER ISLAND,
13
Defendant.
14
15
This matter comes before the Court on Defendant’s unopposed 1 motions to continue the
16
trial date (Dkt. No. 42) and extend the time to file dispositive motions (Dkt. No. 44). Having
17
thoroughly considered the parties’ briefing and the relevant record, the Court GRANTS the
18
motions for the reasons explained herein.
19
Defendant seeks an additional continuance of the trial date, following a sua sponte
20
continuance by the Court. According to Defendant, counsel is unavailable on the date selected by
21
the Court, July 30, 2018, and a change of counsel would pose a hardship because of current
22
counsel’s trial preparation to this point. (Dkt. No. 42 at 2–3.) Defendant also seeks an extension
23
of time to file dispositive motions, based on changes to Plaintiff’s alleged causes of action during
24
25
26
1
Plaintiff filed untimely responses in opposition to both of Defendant’s motions. (See
Dkt. Nos. 49, 50) (due March 7, 2018 per Local Rule 7(d)(2) but filed on March 12, 2018). The
Court considers these untimely responses as an admission that Defendant’s motions have merit.
W.D. Wash. Local Civ. R. 7(b)(2).
ORDER
C17-0265-JCC
PAGE - 1
1
the pendency of this proceeding. (Dkt. No. 44 at 2–3.) Defendant asserts that a summary
2
judgment motion would narrow and potentially eliminate remaining issues for trial. (Id. at 3.)
3
Scheduling orders may be modified for good cause. Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4). The Court
4
finds good cause to continue the trial date and extend the time to file dispositive motions.
5
Defendant was diligent in pursuing discovery and preparing for trial; there is a significant need
6
for a continuance; the inconvenience to the opposing party, witnesses, and the Court is minimal;
7
and denial of a continuance would result in a hardship to Defendant. (See Dkt. Nos. 42 at 2–3, 44
8
at 3–5); U.S. v. 2.61 Acres of Land, 791 F.2d 666, 670–71 (9th Cir. 1986).
9
For the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion to continue the trial
10
date (Dkt. No. 42) and Defendant’s motion to extend the time to file dispositive motions (Dkt.
11
No. 44). The Court enters the amended case management deadlines below. Defendant previously
12
filed motions in limine (Dkt. No. 35). The Court will consider these motions in limine, as well as
13
additional motions in limine filed by either party, consistent with these amended case
14
management deadlines.
15
Amended case management deadlines are as follows:
16
•
Dispositive motion cutoff:
April 27, 2018
17
•
Motions in limine: 2
July 12, 2018
18
•
Objections to motions in limine: 3
July 23, 2018
19
•
Pretrial order:
August 10, 2018
20
•
Trial briefs, Proposed Voir Dire,
Proposed Jury Instructions & Verdict Form: August 13, 2018
•
Trial date:
21
22
23
24
25
26
August 20, 2018
The Clerk is DIRECTED to re-note Defendant’s motions in limine (Dkt. No. 35) to July
27, 2018.
2
Both parties may provide additional motions in limine by this date.
3
Both parties may object to any motion in limine by this date.
ORDER
C17-0265-JCC
PAGE - 2
1
DATED this 14th day of March 2018.
A
2
3
4
John C. Coughenour
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
ORDER
C17-0265-JCC
PAGE - 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?