Morris v. United States of America

Filing 8

MINUTE ORDER. On March 22, 2017, the Court granted the Government's unopposed motion to stay the case (Dkt. No. 7 ) based on three appeals pending with the Ninth Circuit that the parties agreed would be dispositive of the Petitioner's cla ims. (Dkt. No. 7 at 1.) As those appeals are still pending, the Court DIRECTS the Clerk to statistically close this case pending decisions in those cases. The parties are ORDERED to submit a proposed briefing schedule within 30 days after the entry of judgment in the latest of those three cases. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH)

Download PDF
THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 9 WAYNE N. MORRIS, 10 Petitioner, MINUTE ORDER v. 11 12 CASE NO. C17-0268-JCC UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 13 Respondent. 14 15 16 17 The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable John C. Coughenour, United States District Judge: This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. On March 22, 2017, the Court granted the 18 Government’s unopposed motion to stay the case (Dkt. No. 7) based on three appeals pending 19 with the Ninth Circuit that the parties agreed would be dispositive of the Petitioner’s claims. 20 (Dkt. No. 7 at 1.) As those appeals are still pending, the Court DIRECTS the Clerk to statistically 21 close this case pending decisions in those cases. The parties are ORDERED to submit a proposed 22 briefing schedule within 30 days after the entry of judgment in the latest of those three cases. 23 DATED this 26th day of September 2017. 24 // 25 // 26 MINUTE ORDER C17-0268-JCC PAGE - 1 William M. McCool Clerk of Court 1 2 s/Tomas Hernandez Deputy Clerk 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 MINUTE ORDER C17-0268-JCC PAGE - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?