Perryman et al v. City of Seattle Police et al
Filing
105
ORDER re plaintiff's 101 MOTION to Appoint Counsel; directing plaintiff to complete the attached Financial Affidavit and file it within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order, by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
_________________________________
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
)
RHINO ROOM, et al.,
)
)
Defendants. )
_________________________________ )
SEAN PERRYMAN,
13
14
15
16
17
Case No. C17-0274RSL
ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO
APPOINT COUNSEL
This matter comes before the Court on plaintiff’s “Application for Court-Appointed
Counsel.” Dkt. # 101.1 Unlike indigent defendants in criminal cases, civil litigants have no
constitutional right to counsel at the expense of another. Although the judiciary will sometimes
request that members of the bar assist plaintiffs under the authority of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1), it
18
does so only in exceptional circumstances. See Palmer v. Valdez, 560 F.3d 965, 970 (9th Cir.
19
2009). When determining whether to appoint counsel, the courts of the Ninth Circuit generally
20
consider whether plaintiff is indigent, the likelihood of success on the merits, and plaintiff’s
21
ability “to articulate his claims pro se in light of the complexity of the legal issues involved.”
22
Weygandt v. Look, 718 F.2d 952, 954 (9th Cir. 1983).
23
24
25
26
1
Plaintiff also filed a “Motion to Stay to Obtain Court Appointed Legal Counsel for Pro Se
Litigants” (Dkt. # 103) in which he seeks a stay of this litigation until his request for counsel is resolved.
Scheduling depositions has been difficult in this case, however, and counsel for defendant Rhino Room
will not be available for proceedings in this litigation from February 1 to March 1, 2018. The Court will
not grant the requested relief before giving defendants an opportunity to respond. The motion for stay is
therefore noted for consideration on the Court’s calendar for January 26, 2018.
ORDER
1
The Court finds that the second and third factors support the appointment of counsel to
2
represent Mr. Perryman. His pro se status is clearly impairing his ability to identify applicable
3
legal theories, to focus his discovery and argument on the elements of potentially viable causes
4
of action, and to pursue some of the forms of relief he seeks. Plaintiff has not, however, provided
5
6
7
information regarding his financial circumstances. If plaintiff is able to afford an attorney, he
would not be entitled to counsel at the expense of another.2 Plaintiff shall, therefore, complete
under penalty of perjury the attached Financial Affidavit and filed it within fourteen days of the
8
date of this Order.
9
10
Dated this 10th day of January, 2018.
11
A
12
Robert S. Lasnik
United States District Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Plaintiffs were granted leave to appeal in forma pauperis in July 2017, but the application was
filed by the Reverend Wayne Perryman and contained very little information regarding plaintiff’s
financial condition (then or now).
ORDER
-2-
FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT
1
2
3
I, Sean Perryman, declare that I am the plaintiff in this case and that I am unable to afford an
attorney. In support of my request for appointment of counsel, I answer all of the following
4
5
questions as follows:
6
7
8
1. Are you presently employed?
G Yes Total amount of net monthly salary (take home pay) $__________
9
Name and address of employer _________________________________________
10
11
G No
Date of last employment ________Total amount of last net monthly salary $__________
12
13
2. If married, is your spouse presently employed?
G Not married
14
15
G Yes Total amount of spouse’s net monthly salary (take home pay) $__________
Name and address of employer _________________________________________
16
17
G No
Date of spouse’s last employment ______Total amount of last net monthly salary $______
18
19
20
3. For the past twelve months, list the amount of money you and/or your spouse have received
from any of the following sources:
21
a. Business, profession, or other self-employment
$____________
22
b. Income from rent, interest, or dividends
$____________
23
c. Pensions, annuities, or life insurance payments
$____________
24
d. Disability, unemployment, workers compensation, or public assistance
$____________
e. Gifts or inheritance
$____________
f. Money received from child support or alimony
$____________
25
26
g. Describe any other source of income_____________________________ $____________
1
2
4. List the amount for each of the following for you and/or your spouse:
3
Cash on hand $__________
Checking Account $__________
Savings Account $_________
4
5
6
7
8
5. Do you and/or your spouse own or have any interest in any real estate, stocks, bonds, notes,
retirement plans, automobiles, or other valuable property (valued at over $500 excluding ordinary
household furnishings and clothing)? If Yes, describe the property and state its approximate value:
G Yes
$____________
9
10
11
12
G No
13
14
6. Are any persons dependent upon you or your spouse for support? If Yes, state their relationship
15
to you or your spouse, and indicate how much is contributed toward their support each month. (Do
16
not include names of minor children.)
17
G Yes
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
G No
$____________
1
7. Describe the types of monthly expenses you incur, such as housing, transportation, utilities, loan
2
payments, or other regular monthly expenses and the amount spent each month.
3
$____________
4
5
6
7
8
8. Provide any other information that will help explain why you cannot afford to hire an attorney.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
16
17
18
____________________
_____________________________________
19
Date
Signature of Sean Perryman
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?