Perryman et al v. City of Seattle Police et al

Filing 41

ORDER denying as moot Defendants City of Seattle and Seattle Police Department's 29 Motion to Stay, by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT) (cc: Plaintiffs via USPS)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
_________________________________
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
v.
)
)
CITY OF SEATTLE, et al.,
)
)
Defendants. )
_________________________________ )
WAYNE PERRYMAN, et al.,

Case No. C17-0274RSL
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR STAY

13
14

This matter comes before the Court on “Defendants City of Seattle [and] Seattle Police

15

Department’s Motion to Stay.” Dkt. # 29. Defendants sought a continuance of the deadline in

16

which to respond to plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and a continuance of all other

17

deadlines until their pending motion to dismiss is resolved. Plaintiffs oppose the motion.

18

Defendants have now responded to the summary judgment motion, and the Court has not

19

yet issued a case management order or otherwise set any pretrial deadlines. Defendants’ motion

20

for stay is therefore DENIED as moot.

21
22

Dated this 15th day of May, 2017.

23

A
Robert S. Lasnik

24

United States District Judge

25
26
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR STAY