Perryman et al v. City of Seattle Police et al

Filing 50

ORDER Denying Plaintiffs' 49 Second Motion for Reconsideration, signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (cc: Plaintiffs via U.S. Mail) (KERR)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12

_______________________________________
)
WAYNE PERRYMAN, et al.,
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
v.
)
)
CITY OF SEATTLE POLICE, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_______________________________________)

No. C17-0274RSL
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’
SECOND MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION

13
14

This matter comes before the Court on “Plaintiffs’ Addendum Motion for

15

Reconsideration.” Dkt. # 49. Plaintiffs filed a timely motion seeking reconsideration of the

16

Court’s order dismissing the claims against the City defendants. That motion was denied on June

17

7, 2017. A second motion for reconsideration regarding the same decision is not authorized by

18

the local rules of this district, nor have plaintiffs shown “manifest error in the prior ruling” or

19

“new facts or legal authority which could not have been brought to [the Court’s] attention earlier

20

with reasonable diligence.” LCR 7(h)(1). Plaintiffs’ second motion for reconsideration is

21

DENIED.

22
23

Dated this 13th day of June, 2017.

A
Robert S. Lasnik

24

United States District Judge

25
26
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION