Laddi et al v. Soraya Motor Co. et al

Filing 30

MINUTE ORDER granting the parties' 26 Stipulated motion to seal and the document 17 -2 shall remain sealed. The parties also stipulate that they will withdraw the pending, and not stipulated to, motion to seal (Dkt. No. 24 ). Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (PM)

Download PDF
THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 9 GURSHARAN LADDI, et al., 10 Plaintiffs, CASE NO. C17-0287-JCC MINUTE ORDER v. 11 SORAYA MOTOR CO., et al., 12 13 Defendants. 14 15 16 The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable John C. Coughenour, United States District Judge: 17 This matter comes come before this Court on the parties’ stipulated motion to seal (Dkt. 18 No. 26). 1 The Court starts from the position that “[t]here is a strong presumption of public access 19 to [its] files.” W.D. Wash. Local Civ. R. 5(g)(3); see also Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435 20 U.S. 589, 597 (1978). However, a particularized showing of good cause will suffice to warrant 21 sealing discovery documents attached to non-dispositive motions. Kamakana v. City and Cnty. of 22 Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1180 (9th Cir. 2006). The parties wish to seal Dkt. No. 17-2 because it 23 contains several months of birth and the first five digits of various Social Security Numbers. (Id. 24 at 2.) The Court, finding a particularized showing of good cause, GRANTS the motion and the 25 26 1 The parties also stipulate that they will withdraw the pending, and not stipulated to, motion to seal (Dkt. No. 24). (Dkt. No. 26 at 1.) MINUTE ORDER C17-0287-JCC PAGE - 1 1 2 document, (Dkt. No. 17-2), shall remain sealed. DATED this 11th day of April 2017. 3 William M. McCool Clerk of Court 4 s/Paula McNabb Deputy Clerk 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 MINUTE ORDER C17-0287-JCC PAGE - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?