Laddi et al v. Soraya Motor Co. et al
Filing
30
MINUTE ORDER granting the parties' 26 Stipulated motion to seal and the document 17 -2 shall remain sealed. The parties also stipulate that they will withdraw the pending, and not stipulated to, motion to seal (Dkt. No. 24 ). Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (PM)
THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
7
8
9
GURSHARAN LADDI, et al.,
10
Plaintiffs,
CASE NO. C17-0287-JCC
MINUTE ORDER
v.
11
SORAYA MOTOR CO., et al.,
12
13
Defendants.
14
15
16
The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable John C.
Coughenour, United States District Judge:
17
This matter comes come before this Court on the parties’ stipulated motion to seal (Dkt.
18
No. 26). 1 The Court starts from the position that “[t]here is a strong presumption of public access
19
to [its] files.” W.D. Wash. Local Civ. R. 5(g)(3); see also Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435
20
U.S. 589, 597 (1978). However, a particularized showing of good cause will suffice to warrant
21
sealing discovery documents attached to non-dispositive motions. Kamakana v. City and Cnty. of
22
Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1180 (9th Cir. 2006). The parties wish to seal Dkt. No. 17-2 because it
23
contains several months of birth and the first five digits of various Social Security Numbers. (Id.
24
at 2.) The Court, finding a particularized showing of good cause, GRANTS the motion and the
25
26
1
The parties also stipulate that they will withdraw the pending, and not stipulated to, motion to seal (Dkt. No. 24).
(Dkt. No. 26 at 1.)
MINUTE ORDER C17-0287-JCC
PAGE - 1
1
2
document, (Dkt. No. 17-2), shall remain sealed.
DATED this 11th day of April 2017.
3
William M. McCool
Clerk of Court
4
s/Paula McNabb
Deputy Clerk
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
MINUTE ORDER C17-0287-JCC
PAGE - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?