Uppal v. Kelly et al

Filing 13

ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENTS TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD BY 6/26/17; clerk directed to renote respondents' motion to dismiss for 6/26/17 by Hon. James P. Donohue. (RS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 7 8 DALJINDER SINGH UPPAL, Petitioner, 9 10 11 Case No. C17-306-TSZ-JPD ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENTS TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD v. JOHN KELLY, et al., Respondent. 12 13 14 This is a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 immigration habeas action. The record indicates that 15 petitioner was scheduled for immigration hearings on April 6, 2017, and April 19, 2017, see Dkt. 16 8 at 6, but the Court does not have information regarding the outcomes of those hearings. So that 17 the Court’s resolution of petitioner’s habeas petition is based on a full and complete record, the 18 Court ORDERS: 19 (1) By June 26, 2017, respondents shall supplement the record with any immigration 20 court orders regarding the April 2017 hearings and any other relevant immigration proceedings 21 that have occurred since then. 22 23 (2) Before supplementing the record, respondents shall meet and confer with plaintiff’s counsel regarding the supplemental records. Respondents shall notify the Court ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENTS TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD - 1 1 whether plaintiff has any objection to the supplemental records. Respondents shall not include 2 any argument with the supplemental records, however, they may request leave to file a 3 supplemental brief. 4 (3) The Clerk is directed to RE-NOTE respondents’ motion to dismiss, Dkt. 8, for 5 June 26, 2017, and to send copies of this order to the parties and to the Honorable Thomas S. 6 Zilly. 7 Dated this 13th day of June, 2017. 8 A 9 JAMES P. DONOHUE Chief United States Magistrate Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENTS TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?