Rodriguez v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. et al

Filing 25

ORDER granting defendants' 18 Motion for Summary Judgment ; Plaintiff's claims against Defendants SPS and the Trust are dismissed with prejudice, signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS)

Download PDF
THE HONORABLE ROBERT S. LASNIK 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 Melin T. Rodriguez, No. 2:17-cv-00317-RSL 9 Plaintiff, 10 v. 11 12 13 Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.; Northwest Trustee Services, Inc.; U.S. Bank, N.A., as Trustee for First Franklin Mortgage Loan Trust Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, ORDER GRANTING SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC.’S AND U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS TRUSTEE’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendants. 14 15 16 This matter came before the Court on Defendants U.S. Bank National Association, as 17 trustee for the holders of the First Franklin Mortgage Loan Trust Mortgage Pass-Through 18 Certificates, Series 2005-FF10 1 (the “Trust”), and Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (“SPS”) 19 (collectively “Defendants”) Motion for Summary Judgment. 20 21 22 The Court has considered the pleadings and records on file, including the motion for summary judgment and any filings in opposition or reply. Being fully advised, IT IS ORDERED that Defendants SPS and the Trust’s Motion for 23 Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Plaintiffs’ claims against Defendants SPS and the Trust are 24 dismissed with prejudice. 25 1 26 The complete name of the Trust was not identified in the Complaint but was set forth in the Answer and is used here for clarity. ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Case No. 2:17-cv-00317-RSL) - 1 92961931.1 0052161-04586 1 Dated this 7th day of July, 2017. 2 A Robert S. Lasnik 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Case No. 2:17-cv-00317-RSL) - 2 92961931.1 0052161-04586

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?