Lamb v. Monroe Prison
Filing
19
ORDER directing Respondent to submit state court record by 9/5/2017; Petitioner's 5 amended federal habeas petition is RE-NOTED FOR 9/8/2017. Signed by Hon. James P. Donohue. **2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Brodie Lamb, Prisoner ID: 337609)(PM)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
5
6
7
BRODIE M. LAMB,
Petitioner,
8
9
10
Case No. C17-319-RAJ-JPD
v.
ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO
SUBMIT STATE COURT RECORD
MICHAEL OBENLAND,
Respondent.
11
12
13
This is a federal habeas action brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner’s petition for
14
writ of habeas corpus is currently ripe for consideration. However, upon review of the
15
submissions of the parties, this Court discovered that while it received respondent’s notice of
16
submission of the relevant state court record (Dkt. 15), it never received the actual documents
17
referenced in the notice. The Court is unable to proceed to disposition of petitioner’s federal
18
habeas petition until it has the state court record available for review.
19
Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS as follows:
20
(1)
Respondent shall submit all relevant portions of the state court record, including a
21
copy of the audio recording of petitioner’s guilty plea hearing, to this Court not later than
22
September 8, 2017.
23
ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO
SUBMIT STATE COURT RECORD - 1
1
2
3
4
5
(2)
Petitioner’s amended federal habeas petition (Dkt. 5) is RE-NOTED on the
Court’s calendar for consideration on September 8, 2017.
(3)
The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to petitioner, to counsel for
respondent, and to the Honorable Richard A. Jones.
DATED this 7th day of August, 2017.
A
6
7
JAMES P. DONOHUE
Chief United States Magistrate Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO
SUBMIT STATE COURT RECORD - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?