Lamb v. Monroe Prison

Filing 19

ORDER directing Respondent to submit state court record by 9/5/2017; Petitioner's 5 amended federal habeas petition is RE-NOTED FOR 9/8/2017. Signed by Hon. James P. Donohue. **2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Brodie Lamb, Prisoner ID: 337609)(PM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 5 6 7 BRODIE M. LAMB, Petitioner, 8 9 10 Case No. C17-319-RAJ-JPD v. ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO SUBMIT STATE COURT RECORD MICHAEL OBENLAND, Respondent. 11 12 13 This is a federal habeas action brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner’s petition for 14 writ of habeas corpus is currently ripe for consideration. However, upon review of the 15 submissions of the parties, this Court discovered that while it received respondent’s notice of 16 submission of the relevant state court record (Dkt. 15), it never received the actual documents 17 referenced in the notice. The Court is unable to proceed to disposition of petitioner’s federal 18 habeas petition until it has the state court record available for review. 19 Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS as follows: 20 (1) Respondent shall submit all relevant portions of the state court record, including a 21 copy of the audio recording of petitioner’s guilty plea hearing, to this Court not later than 22 September 8, 2017. 23 ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO SUBMIT STATE COURT RECORD - 1 1 2 3 4 5 (2) Petitioner’s amended federal habeas petition (Dkt. 5) is RE-NOTED on the Court’s calendar for consideration on September 8, 2017. (3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to petitioner, to counsel for respondent, and to the Honorable Richard A. Jones. DATED this 7th day of August, 2017. A 6 7 JAMES P. DONOHUE Chief United States Magistrate Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO SUBMIT STATE COURT RECORD - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?