Lamb v. Monroe Prison
MINUTE ORDER re Order to Show Cause 21 . The Court is satisfied that respondent attempted to comply with the Court's directives and, thus, that sanctions are not warranted. Accordingly, petitioner's amended federal habeas petition (Dkt. 5 ) is deemed ripe for consideration. The Clerk directed to re-note respondent's Answer 14 to 9/29/2017, signed by Hon. James P. Donohue. **2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Brodie Lamb, Prisoner ID: 337609)(PM)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
BRODIE M. LAMB,
Case No. C17-319-RAJ-JPD
The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable James P.
Donohue, United States Magistrate Judge:
On September 15, 2017, this Court issued an Order directing respondent to show cause
why sanctions should not be imposed for his failure to respond to a prior Order directing him to
submit all relevant portions of the state court record. (See Dkt. 21.) Respondent filed a response
to the Order to Show Cause on September 28, 2017, explaining that he had twice shipped the
state court record documents to this Court, once on July 5, 2017 and once on September7, 2017,
and that UPS tracking documents reflect both shipments were received by the Clerk. (See Dkt.
22.) While neither the Clerk nor this Court were able to locate those shipments, the Court is
MINUTE ORDER - 1
satisfied that respondent attempted to comply with the Court’s directives and, thus, that sanctions
are not warranted.
Contemporaneously with his response to the Order to Show Cause, respondent
resubmitted the relevant state court record to the Court and the documents are now in the Court’s
possession. Accordingly, petitioner’s amended federal habeas petition (Dkt. 5) is deemed ripe
for consideration as of Friday, September 29, 2017. The Clerk shall re-note respondent’s
answer (Dkt. 14) on the calendar for consideration on that date.
DATED this 6th day of October, 2017.
WILLIAM McCOOL, Clerk
By s/ Tomas Hernandez
MINUTE ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?